Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30028867›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Comparative validation of a microcapsule-based immunoassay for the detection of proteins and nucleic acids.

Sujit Kumar Verma, Anja Karin Albrecht, Verena Siebecke, Gerd Klöck, Tatiana A Kolesnikova, Sebastian Springer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sujit Kumar VermaDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Anja Karin AlbrechtCity University of Applied Sciences, Bremen, Germany.
Verena SiebeckeCity University of Applied Sciences, Bremen, Germany.
Gerd KlöckCity University of Applied Sciences, Bremen, Germany.
Tatiana A KolesnikovaDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.
Sebastian SpringerDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-6149
Constructor University · DEHochschule Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To detect and study diseases, research and clinical laboratories must quantify specific biomarkers in the plasma and urine of patients with precision, sensitivity, and cost-effectiveness. Newly developed techniques, such as particle-based immunoassays, must be validated in these terms against standard methods such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Here, we compare the performance of assays that use hollow polyelectrolyte microcapsules with assays based on solid plastic beads, and with standard microplate immunoassays. The polyelectrolyte microcapsules detect the disease biomarker beta-2 microglobulin with a fifty-fold increase in sensitivity than polystyrene (PS) beads. For sequence-specific nucleic acid detection, the oligonucleotide-coated microcapsules exhibit a two-fold lower increase in sensitivity over PS beads. The microcapsules also detect the presence of a monoclonal antibody in hybridoma supernatant at a fifty-six-fold increase in sensitivity compared to a microplate assay. Overall, polyelectrolyte microcapsule-based assays are more sensitive for the detection of protein and nucleic acid analytes than PS beads and microplate assays, and they are viable alternatives as a platform for the rapid quantitative detection of analytes at very low concentrations.

Indexed as

AnimalsCapsulesCell LineDNAHumansImmunoassayMicrospheresPolystyrenesProteinsRNACapsulesDNAPolystyrenesProteinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID30028867
PMCPMC6054379
OpenAlexW2884589285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.