ArticleIEEE transactions on medical imaging2019
Visualization of the Intensity Field of a Focused Ultrasound Source In Situ.
Article in IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional passive acoustic mapping of high intensity focused ultrasound fields using sparse synthetic apertures from rotated one-dimensional linear arrays.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Soft Tissue Aberration Correction for Histotripsy Using Acoustic Emissions From Cavitation Cloud Nucleation and Collapse.Ultrasound in medicine & biology · 2023Article
- A Microfluidic System of Gene Transfer by Ultrasound.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Real-Time Visualization of a Focused Ultrasound Beam Using Ultrasonic Backscatter.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021Article
- Fast qualitative two-dimensional mapping of ultrasound fields with acoustic cavitation-enhanced ultrasound imaging.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- High-intensity focused ultrasound-induced mechanochemical transduction in synthetic elastomers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In an increasing number of applications of focused ultrasound (FUS) therapy, such as opening of the blood-brain barrier or collapsing microbubbles in a tumor, elevation of tissue temperature is not involved. In these cases, real-time visualization of the field distribution of the FUS source would allow localization of the FUS beam within the targeted tissue and allow repositioning of the FUS beam during tissue motion. In this paper, in order to visualize the FUS beam in situ, a 6-MHz single-element transducer ( f /2) was used as the FUS source and aligned perpendicular to a linear array which passively received scattered ultrasound from the sample. An image of the reconstructed intensity field pattern of the FUS source using bistatic beamforming was then superimposed on a registered B-mode image of the sample acquired using the same linear array. The superimposed image is used to provide anatomical context of the FUS beam in the sample being treated. The intensity field pattern reconstructed from a homogeneous scattering phantom was compared with the field characteristics of the FUS source characterized by the wire technique. The beamwidth estimates at the FUS focus using the in situ reconstruction technique and the wire technique were 1.5 and 1.2 mm, respectively. The depth-of-field estimates for the in situ reconstruction technique and the wire technique were 11.8 and 16.8 mm, respectively. The FUS beams were also visualized in a two-layer phantom and a chicken breast. The novel reconstruction technique was able to accurately visualize the field of an FUS source in the context of the interrogated medium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.