ArticleThe Permanente journal2018
Comparative Effectiveness of Surgical Options for Patients with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: An Instrumental Variable Approach.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextMany patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) receive treatment that is too extensive.
objectiveTo take a holistic approach in comparing the effectiveness in cancer prevention between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for patients with DCIS.
designFemale Kaiser Permanente Southern California members who underwent surgery for treatment of single primary DCIS from 2004 to 2014 were identified by the Kaiser Permanente Southern California cancer registry and HealthConnect database.
methodTwo-stage residual inclusion with the surgeon's preference of surgical procedure type as the instrumental variable was used to examine the effect of surgical choice on DCIS recurrence, breast cancer progression, and other cancer progression. Traditional Cox proportional hazards models were used for comparison.
resultsOf qualified subjects, 72.2% underwent BCS and 27.8% underwent mastectomy. Patients were likelier to receive BCS if their surgeon preferred to perform BCS in the past 5 years (odds ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval = 1.02-1.03). Although traditional Cox proportional hazards models suggested an association between BCS and higher risk of DCIS recurrence, no significant effect was observed when we adjusted for endogeneity. Neither model showed significant differences between mastectomy and BCS in progression of any cancer.
conclusionNo significant benefit was observed with a more aggressive surgical procedure in preventing DCIS recurrence or cancer progression in a diverse population. Many patients with DCIS could benefit from BCS with preservation of their body image. Breast conservation followed-up with cancer surveillance is a rational approach to ensure affordable, effective care for patients with DCIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.