ArticleNeural regeneration research2018
Is transesophageal echocardiography needed for evaluating tissue-based transient ischemic attack?
Article in Neural regeneration research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a warning signal for stroke. A comprehensive evaluation of TIA may reduce the risk for subsequent stroke. Data on the findings of cardiac evaluation with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients with TIA are sparse. Our aims were to determine the frequency of TEE performance and to investigate the findings of TEE in patients with TIA based on the new definition of TIA (i.e., transient neurological symptoms without evidence of infarction). During a 4-year period (2011-2014), 1071 patients (mean age, 70 ± 13 years; female, 49.7%) with TIA were included in a prospective study and evaluated. Of 1071 consecutive patients suffering from TIA, 288 patients (27%) underwent TEE. The median time between admission and TEE was 6 days. Patients with TIA who were evaluated by TEE were younger (67 vs. 71 years, P < 0.001) than those who were not evaluated by TEE. They had a higher rate of sensibility disturbance as a TIA symptom (39% vs. 31%, P = 0.012) but a lower rate of previous stroke (15% vs. 25%, P = 0.001) and atrial fibrillation (2% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) than those who did not. Foramen ovale was detected in 71 patients (25.7%), atrial septal aneurysm in 13 patients (4.6%), and severe atherosclerotic plaques (grade 4 and 5) in the aortic arch in 25 patients (8.7%). One patient (0.3%) had a fibroma detected by TEE. In 17 of the 288 patients (6%) who underwent TEE, the indication for anticoagulation therapy was based on the TEE results, and 1 patient with fibroma underwent heart surgery. During hospitalization, 7 patients experienced a subsequent stroke, and 27 patients had a recurrent TIA. At 3 months following discharge, the rates of readmission, stroke, recurrent TIA, and death were 19%, 2.7%, 4.2%, and 1.6%, respectively. The rates of mortality (0.9% vs. 1.8%, P = 0.7), stroke risk (1.9% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.8), and recurrent TIA (5.0% vs. 3.9%, P = 0.8) were similar in patients who underwent TEE and in those who did not. Performing TEE in patients with tissue-based TIA is helpful in detecting cardiac sources for embolism and may indicate for anticoagulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.