Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30028257›Full record

ArticleLupus2018

Antiphospholipid antibodies in women with severe preeclampsia and placental insufficiency: a case-control study.

K J Gibbins, A E Tebo, S K Nielsen, D W Branch

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. [Obstetric Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Insights on the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Hot Issues].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Early-onset preeclampsia - The impact of antiphospholipid antibodies on disease severity.European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K J Gibbins1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7431-3451
A E Tebo2 Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City; UT ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
S K Nielsen1 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
D W Branch3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Intermountain Healthcare Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Utah Women's Reproductive Health Research Career Development ProgramK12HD085816 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SILVER, ROBERT M. · 2015 to 2024
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD085816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Preterm delivery for preeclampsia or placental insufficiency (PREPI) is a clinical criterion for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), but no prior prospective studies have used the international classification criteria for APS. Our objective is to determine the proportion of women with PREPI who test positive for aPL using international criteria for antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) assays. Methods We conducted a prospective, case-control study of 148 women delivered < 36 weeks because of PREPI compared to 148 controls. PREPI cases delivered < 36 weeks were compared to matched controls. Cases and controls were tested for aPL. Demographic variables were compared with chi-squared and Wilcoxon-rank-sum statistics. Rates of + aPL were compared using adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for maternal body mass index (BMI) and Caucasian race. Positive aPL (+aPL) was defined as lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL) immunoglobulin G (IgG) (GPL) or immunoglobulin M (IgM) (MPL) ≥ 40, or anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgG (SGU) or IgM (SMU) ≥ 40. Results Controls were more likely to be Caucasian (87% vs 70%, p = 0.006) and had lower BMIs (BMI 26 vs 33, p < 0.001). Positive aPL were found more commonly in cases than controls (11.5% vs 1.4%, aOR 8.9 (95% CI 1.9-41.4)). In + aPL cases, 76% had + LA, 41% had + aCL, and 24% had + aβ2GPI. Conclusion Women requiring early delivery for PREPI are more likely to have aPL (and thus APS) than controls. This is the first prospective study using both obstetric definitions and laboratory criteria in accordance with APS international criteria.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAntiphospholipid SyndromeCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisPlacental InsufficiencyPre-EclampsiaPregnancyProspective StudiesUtahAntibodies, AntiphospholipidAnticardiolipin antibodiesantiphospholipid syndromepregnancy

Identifiers

PMID30028257
PMCPMC6085160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.