ArticleThe British journal of radiology2018
Computed tomography cavernosography combined with volume rendering to observe venous leakage in young patients with erectile dysfunction.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sub-gluteal ligation of the internal pudendal vein for management of veno-occlusive erectile dysfunction (Shaeer's Vein Ligation-I): the cadaveric study.International journal of impotence research · 2026Article
- Venous Leak Embolization Results in Clinical Improvement of Patients with Mixed Arterio-Venous Erectile Dysfunction Not Responding to Arterial Revascularization Alone.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Observational
- Erectile dysfunction: role of computed tomography cavernosography in the diagnosis and treatment planning of venous leak.CVIR endovascular · 2023Review
- Percutaneous Treatment of Venous Erectile Dysfunction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objective: To observe the venous leakage of penile veins through cavernosometry and cavernosography, using CT combined with three-dimensional volume rendering.
methods: 186 consecutive erectile dysfunction patients (20-40 years old) with suspected venous leakage diagnosed by clinicians were enrolled. All patients underwent intracavernous injection of vasoactive agents combined with Doppler ultrasound to identify venous leakage.
results: Taking intracavernous injection combined with Doppler ultrasound as the "gold-standard", 47/186 (25.3%) patients had negative venous leakage, and 139/186 (74.7%) patients had positive venous leakage. CT cavernosography showed that 22/139 (15.8%) cases were isolated deep dorsal vein or crural vein leakage, and 117/139 (84.2%) cases were complex venous leakage. Three types of deep dorsal vein were seen: single-branch 42/139 (30.2.%), double-branch 45/139 (32.4%), and complex 31/139 (22.3%). Three types of prostatic venous plexus were seen: single-branch 26/139 (18.7%), multiple-branch 36/139 (25.9%), and plexus 39/139 (28.1%). A total of 166 crural veins were revealed in 129 patients. Crural veins had three origins: medial dorsal side (112/166, 67.5%), lateral ventral side (30/166, 18.1%) and the curs tip (24/166, 14.4%).
conclusion: To achieve the expected success rate of ligation surgery or endovascular embolization, candidates for the procedures should be carefully selected through CT cavernosography, which can provide elaborate images and information about the venous leakage. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE:: A modified evaluation method was used in this study to monitor the intracavernous pressure during examination. New classifications of the deep dorsal vein, prostatic venous plexus and crural vein are described in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.