Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30028083›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2018

Influenza forecast optimization when using different surveillance data types and geographic scale.

Haruka Morita, Sarah Kramer, Alexandra Heaney, Harold Gil, Jeffrey Shaman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimized Forecasting Method for Weekly Influenza Confirmed Cases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haruka MoritaDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9400-9521
Sarah KramerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Alexandra HeaneyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Harold GilMarion County Public Health Department, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Jeffrey ShamanDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York City, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7216-7809

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MATTHEW S PERZANOWSKI · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
Development and Dissemination of Operational Real-Time Respiratory Virus ForecastU01GM110748 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHAMAN, JEFFREY L · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
Interdisciplinary Training in Climate and HealthT32ES023770 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHAMAN, JEFFREY L · 2014 to 2019
$1.5M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES023770NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM110748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvance warning of influenza incidence levels from skillful forecasts could help public health officials and healthcare providers implement more timely preparedness and intervention measures to combat outbreaks. Compared to influenza predictions generated at regional and national levels, those generated at finer scales could offer greater value in determining locally appropriate measures; however, to date, the various influenza surveillance data that are collected by state and county departments of health have not been well utilized in influenza prediction.

objectivesTo assess whether an influenza forecast model system can be optimized to generate accurate forecasts using novel surveillance data streams.

methodsHere, we generate retrospective influenza forecasts with a dynamic, compartmental model-inference system using surveillance data for influenza-like illness (ILI), laboratory-confirmed cases, and pneumonia and influenza mortality at state and county levels. We evaluate how specification of 3 system inputs-scaling, observational error variance (OEV), and filter divergence (lambda)-affects forecast accuracy.

resultsIn retrospective forecasts, and across data types, there were no clear optimal combinations for the 3 system inputs; however, scaling was most critical to forecast accuracy, whereas OEV and lambda were not.

conclusionsForecasts using new data streams should be tested to determine an appropriate scaling value using historical data and analyzed for forecast accuracy.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringForecastingGeographyHumansIncidenceInfluenza, HumanModels, StatisticalRetrospective Studiesforecastinginfluenzaoptimizationsurveillance data

Identifiers

PMID30028083
PMCPMC6185890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.