Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30028025›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of clinical psychology2019

Paranoia and interpersonal functioning across the continuum from healthy to pathological - Network analysis.

Michal Hajdúk, Hans S Klein, Philip D Harvey, David L Penn, Amy E Pinkham

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of clinical psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Social interactions in isolated, confined, and extreme environments: A study of Antarctic winter teams using wearable sensors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Validation of the Eight-Item Paranoid Thoughts Scale (GPTS-8) in Tunisian Arab Adults.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The International Consortium on Paranoia Research: an introduction.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Michal HajdúkDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7073-7564
Hans S KleinSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
Philip D HarveyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Florida, USA.
David L PennDepartment of Psychology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Amy E PinkhamSchool of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA.
The University of Texas at Dallas · USComenius University Bratislava · SKUniversity of Miami · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Social Cognition Psychometric EvaluationR01MH093432 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI HARVEY, PHILIP D., PENN, DAVID LEWIS · 2012 to 2016
$3.2M
National Institute of Mental Health at the National Institutes of Health R01 MH093432NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious research has suggested that paranoia is associated with impaired social functioning in patients with schizophrenia and healthy individuals with high levels of paranoid ideation. This study analysed the relationship between paranoia and interpersonal functioning across the paranoia continuum using network analysis.

methodLevels of paranoid ideation and interpersonal functioning were measured in a non-clinical sample (N = 853) and in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (N = 226). Network analyses were used to examine the nature of paranoia's relation to interpersonal functioning in both populations.

resultsAlthough the most central characteristic of paranoia in both samples was the feeling of being talked about behind one's back, across samples, individual characteristics were differentially related to various aspects of interpersonal functioning. Among clinical individuals, difficulties in interpersonal functioning were related to perceived previous experiences of being treated poorly by others, whereas among the non-clinical sample, interpersonal functioning was related to negative beliefs about others.

conclusionsThe current results support previous findings linking paranoid ideation to interpersonal functioning in both clinical and non-clinical samples. Patterns of these relationships differed slightly across groups. Results in general support a continuum model of paranoia. PRACTITIONER POINTS: Network analyses were used to identify central aspects of persecutory ideation in both clinical and non-clinical samples. Qualitative assessment of clinical and non-clinical networks revealed similar central symptoms and supported a continuum model of paranoia. Central aspects of paranoia, that is, feeling that others have talked about oneself behind one's back, being disappointed by others, and having distressing feelings of being watched by others, were associated with deficits in interpersonal functioning in both samples. Central aspects of paranoia may be beneficial targets for psychosocial interventions aimed at reducing paranoid ideation and improving interpersonal functioning. Demographic characteristics for this study differed between samples which may limit generalization of findings. Future research is needed to explore temporal associations and moment-to-moment dynamics between paranoid ideation and problems in interpersonal functioning.

Indexed as

EmotionsInterpersonal RelationsThinkingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParanoid DisordersPerceptionPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSchizophreniaYoung Adultinterpersonal functioningnetwork analysisparanoia

Identifiers

PMID30028025
PMCPMC6339834
OpenAlexW2884592717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.