Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30027970›Full record

ArticleIntegrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro2018

The tactile receptive fields of freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes.

E A Mazzochette, A L Nekimken, F Loizeau, J Whitworth, B Huynh, M B Goodman, B L Pruitt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. HowGenetics · 2019
    Review
  5. The tactile receptive fields of freely moving Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E A MazzochetteDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA.
A L NekimkenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, 94305, USA.
F LoizeauDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu.
J WhitworthDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu.
B HuynhDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu.
M B GoodmanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, 94305, USA.
B L PruittDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA. mbgoodman@stanford.edu and Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University, 94305, USA and Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, 94305, USA and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Santa Barbara, 93106, USA. blp@ucsb.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4861-2124
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
The biophysics of skin-neuron sensory tactile organs and their sensitivity to mechanical and chemical stressR35NS105092 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2018 to 2025
$6.4M
Molecular Basis of Sensory Transduction in C. elegansR01NS047715 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B · 2004 to 2017
$4.9M
Force Clamp Systems for Evaluation of MechanotransductionR01EB006745 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOODMAN, MIRIAM B, PRUITT, BETH L · 2007 to 2014
$3.1M
Internal Tissue Mechanics and the Sense of Touch in C. elegansF31NS100318 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NEKIMKEN, ADAM · 2017 to 2019
$106k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006745NIH HHS P40 OD010440NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS100318NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047715NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS105092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory neurons embedded in skin are responsible for the sense of touch. In humans and other mammals, touch sensation depends on thousands of diverse somatosensory neurons. By contrast, Caenorhabditis elegans nematodes have six gentle touch receptor neurons linked to simple behaviors. The classical touch assay uses an eyebrow hair to stimulate freely moving C. elegans, evoking evasive behavioral responses. This assay has led to the discovery of genes required for touch sensation, but does not provide control over stimulus strength or position. Here, we present an integrated system for performing automated, quantitative touch assays that circumvents these limitations and incorporates automated measurements of behavioral responses. The Highly Automated Worm Kicker (HAWK) unites a microfabricated silicon force sensor holding a glass bead forming the contact surface and video analysis with real-time force and position control. Using this system, we stimulated animals along the anterior-posterior axis and compared responses in wild-type and spc-1(dn) transgenic animals, which have a touch defect due to expression of a dominant-negative α-spectrin protein fragment. As expected from prior studies, delivering large stimuli anterior and posterior to the mid-point of the body evoked a reversal and a speed-up, respectively. The probability of evoking a response of either kind depended on stimulus strength and location; once initiated, the magnitude and quality of both reversal and speed-up behavioral responses were uncorrelated with stimulus location, strength, or the absence or presence of the spc-1(dn) transgene. Wild-type animals failed to respond when the stimulus was applied near the mid-point. These results show that stimulus strength and location govern the activation of a characteristic motor program and that the C. elegans body surface consists of two receptive fields separated by a gap.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalCaenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsComputer SystemsMechanoreceptorsMechanotransduction, CellularPhysical StimulationSensory Receptor CellsSpectrinTouchCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsSpectrin

Identifiers

PMID30027970
PMCPMC6168290
OpenAlexW2951013679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.