Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30027579›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2018

Efficacy of pemetrexed and carboplatin with or without bevacizumab in lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR non-T790M mutations after progression on first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Zhansheng Jiang, Yu Zhang, Yinli Yang, Zhensong Yue, Zhanyu Pan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Optimal sequencing strategies in the treatment of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhansheng JiangDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Yinli YangDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Zhensong YueDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Zhanyu PanDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital; National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to compare the effects of pemetrexed and carboplatin plus bevacizumab (PC + B) versus pemetrexed and carboplatin (PC) in lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR non-T790M mutations after progression on first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

methodsPatients with EGFR-positive lung adenocarcinoma who had received second-line PC with or without bevacizumab harboring EGFR non-T790M mutations after progression on first-line EGFR-TKIs between April 2015 and 2017 at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital were enrolled in the study. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and secondary endpoints were overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety.

resultsA total of 85 patients were eligible for the study: 55 and 30 cases were enrolled in the PC and PC + B groups, respectively. The median progression-free survival was prolonged with PC + B compared to PC (median 8.2 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.037). The objective response rate was improved with PC + B compared to PC (46.7% vs. 25.5%; P = 0.047) and overall survival prolonged with PC + B compared to PC (median 26.3 vs. 19.2 months; P = 0.012). Safety was similar to previous studies of bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer: one patient experienced grade 3 hypertension and proteinuria but did not require the discontinuation of therapy.

conclusionThe addition of bevacizumab to PC was superior to PC alone as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-T90M EGFR-positive lung adenocarcinoma. However, this result needs to be confirmed by prospective clinical trials.

Indexed as

MutationAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAllelesAmino Acid SubstitutionAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPemetrexedBevacizumabEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsPemetrexedProtein Kinase InhibitorsbevacizumabEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)lung adenocarcinomapemetrexedT790M

Identifiers

PMID30027579
PMCPMC6119611
OpenAlexW2883363927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.