Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30027485›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2019

Genomes shed light on the secret life of Candida glabrata: not so asexual, not so commensal.

Toni Gabaldón, Cécile Fairhead

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Threats from theMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  9. Microbe Profile:Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Toni GabaldónCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Dr. Aiguader 88, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. tgabaldon@crg.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0019-1735
Cécile FairheadGQE-Le Moulon, INRA-Université Paris-Sud-CNRS-AgroParisTech, 91400, Orsay, France.

Funding

Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación BFU2015-67107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida glabrata is an opportunistic yeast pathogen, whose incidence has increased over the last decades. Despite its genus name, this species is actually more closely related to the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae than to other Candida pathogens, such as Candida albicans. Hence, C. glabrata and C. albicans must have acquired the ability to infect humans independently, which is reflected in the use of different mechanism for virulence, and survival in the host. Yet, research on C. glabrata suffers from assumptions carried over from the more studied C. albicans. Regarding the adaptation of C. glabrata to the human host, the prejudice was that, just as C. albicans, C. glabrata is a natural human commensal that turns deadly when immune defenses weaken. It was also considered asexual, as no one has observed mating, diploids, or spores, despite great efforts. However, the recent analysis of whole genomes from globally distributed C. glabrata isolates have shaken these assumptions. C. glabrata seems to be only secondarily associated to humans, as indicated by a lack of co-evolution with its host, and genomic footprints of recombination shows compelling evidence that this yeast is able to have sex. Here, we discuss the implications of this and other recent findings and highlight the new questions opened by this change in paradigm.

Indexed as

Candida glabrataCandidiasisGenes, Mating Type, FungalGenome, FungalGenomicsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansPhylogenyReproductionSymbiosisCandidaCandida glabrataCandidiasisFungal pathogensGenome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID30027485
PMCPMC6342864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.