Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30027449›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2019

Contribution of traumatic deployment experiences to the burden of mental health problems in Canadian Armed Forces personnel: exploration of population attributable fractions.

Jennifer A Born, Mark A Zamorski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Military service and risk of subsequent drug use disorders among Swedish men.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Conducting research during the COVID-19 pandemic: the Op LASER study.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Operational stressors, psychological distress, and turnover intentions: The impact of potentially morally injurious experiences.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  10. Differences in military personnel's hardiness depending on their leadership levels and combat experience: An exploratory pilot study.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer A BornMilitary Personnel Research and Analysis, Research Personnel and Family Support, Department of National Defence (Canada), 101 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1A OK2, Canada. jennifer.born@forces.gc.ca.
Mark A ZamorskiResearch and Analysis Section, Canadian Forces Health Services Group Headquarters, 101 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0K2, Canada.
Canadian Armed Forces · CADepartment of National Defence · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMental health problems are prevalent after combat; they are also common in its absence. Estimates of deployment-attributability vary. This paper quantifies the contribution of different subtypes of occupational trauma to post-deployment mental health problems.

methodsParticipants were a cohort of 16,193 Canadian personnel undergoing post-deployment mental health screening after return from the mission in Afghanistan. The screening questionnaire assessed post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and exposure to 30 potentially traumatic deployment experiences. Logistic regression estimated adjusted population attributable fractions (PAFs) for deployment-related trauma, which was treated as count variables divided into several subtypes of experiences based on earlier factor analytic work.

resultsThe overall PAF for overall deployment-related trauma exposure was 57.5% (95% confidence interval 44.1, 67.7) for the aggregate outcome of any of the four assessed problems. Substantial PAFs were seen even at lower levels of exposure. Among subtypes of trauma, exposure to a dangerous environment (e.g., receiving small arms fire) and to the dead and injured (e.g., handling or uncovering human remains) had the largest PAFs. Active combat (e.g., calling in fire on the enemy) did not have a significant PAF.

conclusionsMilitary deployments involving exposure to a dangerous environment or to the dead or injured will have substantial impacts on mental health in military personnel and others exposed to similar occupational trauma. Potential explanations for divergent findings in the literature on the extent to which deployment-related trauma contributes to the burden of mental disorders are discussed.

Indexed as

AdultAfghan Campaign 2001-Anxiety DisordersCanadaCohort StudiesDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMilitary PersonnelOccupational DiseasesPanic DisorderPrevalenceStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticYoung AdultAfghanistan campaignCanadaCombatGenderMilitary personnelPost-traumatic stress disorder

Identifiers

PMID30027449
OpenAlexW2883741628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.