Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30027347›Full record

Observational studyNeurocritical care2019

Neuroimaging Findings in Sepsis-Induced Brain Dysfunction: Association with Clinical and Laboratory Findings.

Günseli Orhun, Figen Esen, Perihan Ergin Özcan, Serra Sencer, Başar Bilgiç, Canan Ulusoy, Handan Noyan, Melike Küçükerden, Achmet Ali, Mehmet Barburoğlu and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Günseli OrhunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey. gunseli_orhun@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-3604
Figen EsenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Perihan Ergin ÖzcanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serra SencerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Başar BilgiçBehavioral Neurology and Movement Disorders Unit, Department of Neurology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Canan UlusoyDepartment of Neuroscience, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Handan NoyanDepartment of Neuroscience, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Melike KüçükerdenDepartment of Neuroscience, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Achmet AliDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Mehmet BarburoğluDepartment of Neuroradiology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Erdem TüzünDepartment of Neuroscience, Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

Bilimsel Araştirma Projeleri Birimi, Istanbul Üniversitesi 35165Bilimsel Araştirma Projeleri Birimi, Istanbul Üniversitesi 46960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence and patterns of brain lesions of sepsis-induced brain dysfunction (SIBD) have been well defined. Our objective was to investigate the associations between neuroimaging features of SIBD patients and well-known neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration factors.

methodsIn this prospective observational study, 93 SIBD patients (45 men, 48 women; 50.6 ± 12.7 years old) were enrolled. Patients underwent a neurological examination and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Severity-of-disease scoring systems (APACHE II, SOFA, and SAPS II) and neurological outcome scoring system (GOSE) were used. Also, serum levels of a panel of mediators [IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, IFN-γ, TNF-α, complement factor Bb, C4d, C5a, iC3b, amyloid-β peptides, total tau, phosphorylated tau (p-tau), S100b, neuron-specific enolase] were measured by ELISA. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was employed to available patients for assessment of neuronal loss pattern in SIBD.

resultsMRI of SIBD patients were normal (n = 27, 29%) or showed brain lesions (n = 51, 54.9%) or brain atrophy (n = 15, 16.1%). VBM analysis showed neuronal loss in the insula, cingulate cortex, frontal lobe, precuneus, and thalamus. Patients with abnormal MRI findings had worse APACHE II, SOFA, GOSE scores, increased prevalence of delirium and mortality. Presence of MRI lesions was associated with reduced C5a and iC3b levels and brain atrophy was associated with increased p-tau levels. Regression analysis identified an association between C5a levels and presence of lesion on MRI and p-tau levels and the presence of atrophy on MRI.

conclusionsNeuronal loss predominantly occurs in limbic and visceral pain perception regions of SIBD patients. Complement breakdown products and p-tau stand out as adverse neuroimaging outcome markers for SIBD.

Indexed as

Brain DiseasesAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSepsisSeverity of Illness IndexThalamusBrain dysfunctionC5aIL-12NeuroimagingSepsisTau

Identifiers

PMID30027347
OpenAlexW2883928217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.