Trial reportJAMA surgery2018
Venous Thromboembolism Incidence and Prophylaxis Use After Gastrectomy Among Korean Patients With Gastric Adenocarcinoma: The PROTECTOR Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01448746 (Optimal Prophylactic Method of Venous Thromboembolism for Gastrectomy in Korean Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Optimal Prophylactic Method of Venous Thromboembolism for Gastrectomy in Korean Patients
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2023Pooled it
- Combined intermittent pneumatic leg compression and pharmacological prophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Oral anticoagulation in people with cancer who have no therapeutic or prophylactic indication for anticoagulation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention and treatment in patients with cancer.Blood advances · 2021Guideline
- Safety and Efficacy of Reduced-Port Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial (KLASS-12).Journal of gastric cancer · 2025Trial
- Emergency veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation through the femoral vein with a pre-positioned inferior vena cava filter: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2025Article
- Article
- Increased cardiovascular disease risk among adolescents and young adults with gastric cancer.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2024Article
- Predictive modeling of lower extreme deep vein thrombosis following radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: based on multiple machine learning methods.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Emerging Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in Gastrointestinal Tumors: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Neutrophil extracellular traps participate in the development of cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Postoperative Thromboembolism According to the Type of Surgery: A Nationwide Study in the Republic of Korea.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Impact of routine preoperative sonographic screening with early intervention for deep venous thrombosis in lower extremities on preventing postoperative venous thromboembolism in patients with gastric cancer scheduled for minimally invasive surgery.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2022Article
- How Strong Is the Evidence Supporting Thromboprophylaxis in Surgical Oncology?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022Article
- Incidence of venous thromboembolism after standard treatment in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer in Korea.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients.Blood advances · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The guidelines by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society for Clinical Oncology recommend the routine use of thromboprophylaxis for patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. However, many physicians in Asian countries use venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis much less often because of the perceived lower VTE incidence in this population. Objectives: To evaluate the incidence of postgastrectomy VTE in Korean patients with gastric adenocarcinoma, and to identify the complications and evaluate the efficacy and safety of VTE prevention methods. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Optimal Prophylactic Method for Venous Thromboembolism After Gastrectomy in Korean Patients (PROTECTOR) randomized clinical trial was conducted between August 1, 2011, and March 31, 2015. Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma presenting to a single center (Seoul St Mary's Hospital in Seoul, South Korea) were enrolled. Patients were randomized to either an intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC)-only group or an IPC+low-molecular-weight (LMW) heparin sodium group. The data were analyzed on intention-to-treat and per protocol bases. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2016, to October 30, 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Venous thromboembolism incidence was the primary outcome. Postoperative complications, particularly those associated with VTE prophylaxis methods, were the secondary end point. Results: Of the 682 patients enrolled and randomized, 447 (65.5%) were male and 245 (34.5%) were female, with a mean (SD) age of 57.67 (12.94) years. Among the 666 patients included in the analysis, the overall incidence of VTE was 2.1%. The incidence of VTE was statistically significantly higher in the IPC-only group compared with the IPC+LMW heparin group (3.6%; 95% CI, 2.05%-6.14% vs 0.6%; 95% CI, 0.17%-2.18%; P = .008). Among the 14 patients (2.1%) with VTE, 13 were asymptomatic and received a deep vein thrombosis diagnosis, whereas 1 patient received a symptomatic pulmonary thromboembolism diagnosis. The overall incidence of bleeding complications was 5.1%. The incidence of bleeding complications was significantly higher in the IPC+LMW heparin group compared with the IPC-only group (9.1% vs 1.2%; P < .001). No cases of VTE-associated mortality were noted. Conclusions and Relevance: Use of IPC alone is inferior to the use of IPC+LMW heparin in preventing postoperative VTE. Because LMW heparin is associated with a high bleeding risk, further study is needed to stratify the patients at high risk for perioperative development of VTE. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01448746.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.