Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30027269›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2018

Monthly High-Dose Vitamin D Supplementation and Cancer Risk: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Vitamin D Assessment Randomized Clinical Trial.

Robert Scragg, Kay-Tee Khaw, Les Toop, John Sluyter, Carlene M M Lawes, Debbie Waayer, Edward Giovannucci, Carlos A Camargo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of vitamin DAgeing research reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Vitamin D supplementation and total cancer incidence and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2019
    Pooled it
  10. Vitamin D Status and Mortality: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Impact of Cholecalciferol Supplementation on Radiotherapy Outcomes in Advanced Cervical Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. No Association Between Vitamin D Supplementation and Risk of Colorectal Adenomas or Serrated Polyps in a Randomized Trial.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Overview of results from the Vitamin D Assessment (ViDA) study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2019
    Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert ScraggSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kay-Tee KhawDepartment of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Les ToopDepartment of Public Health & General Practice, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand.
John SluyterSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Carlene M M LawesSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Debbie WaayerSchool of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Edward GiovannucciDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Carlos A CamargoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
University of Auckland · NZHarvard University · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

Cancer Research UK 14136Medical Research Council G0401527Medical Research Council G1000143Medical Research Council MR/N003284/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Previous randomized clinical trials have reported inconsistent results on the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cancer incidence. Objective: To examine whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation received monthly, without calcium, is associated with a reduction in cancer incidence and cancer mortality in the general population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a post hoc analysis of data from the Vitamin D Assessment (ViDA) study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that recruited participants from family practices and community groups in Auckland, New Zealand, from April 5, 2011, through November 6, 2012, with follow-up completed December 31, 2015. Participants were adult community residents aged 50 to 84 years. Of 47 905 adults invited from family practices and 163 from community groups, 5110 participants were randomized to receive vitamin D3 (n = 2558) or placebo (n = 2552). Two participants withdrew consent, and all others (n = 5108) were included in the primary analysis. Data analysis was by intention to treat. Interventions: Oral vitamin D3, in an initial bolus dose of 200 000 IU and followed by monthly doses of 100 000 IU, or placebo for a median of 3.3 years (range, 2.5-4.2 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Post hoc primary outcome was the number of all primary invasive and in situ malignant neoplasms (excluding nonmelanoma skin cancers) diagnosed from randomization until the study medication was discontinued on July 31, 2015. Results: Of the 5108 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 65.9 (8.3) years, 58.1% were male, and 4253 (83.3%) were of European or another race/ethnicity, with the remainder being Polynesian or South Asian. Mean (SD) baseline deseasonalized 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration was 26.5 (9.0) ng/mL. In a random sample of 438 participants, the mean follow-up 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration consistently was greater than 20 ng/mL higher in the vitamin D group than in the placebo group. The primary outcome of cancer comprised 328 total cases of cancer (259 invasive and 69 in situ malignant neoplasms) and occurred in 165 of 2558 participants (6.5%) in the vitamin D group and 163 of 2550 (6.4%) in the placebo group, yielding an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.01 (95% CI, 0.81-1.25; P = .95). Conclusions and Relevance: High-dose vitamin D supplementation prescribed monthly for up to 4 years without calcium may not prevent cancer. This study suggests that daily or weekly dosing for a longer period may require further study. Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12611000402943.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDietary SupplementsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsTime FactorsVitamin D25-hydroxyvitamin DVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID30027269
PMCPMC6248079
OpenAlexW2883020573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.