Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30027061›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2018

Self-Triggered Apoptosis Enzyme Prodrug Therapy (STAEPT): Enhancing Targeted Therapies via Recurrent Bystander Killing Effect by Exploiting Caspase-Cleavable Linker.

Seung Woo Chung, Jeong Uk Choi, Young Seok Cho, Ha Rin Kim, Tae Hyung Won, Peter Dimitrion, Ok-Cheol Jeon, Seong Who Kim, In-San Kim, Sang Yoon Kim and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Theranostic Fluorescent Probes.Chemical reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. An overview of antibody-drug conjugates in oncological practice.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Seung Woo ChungResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences College of Pharmacy Seoul National University Seoul 08826 South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4622-2982
Jeong Uk ChoiResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences College of Pharmacy Seoul National University Seoul 08826 South Korea.
Young Seok ChoDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Biopharmaceutical Sciences Graduate School of Convergent Science and Technology Seoul National University Seoul 08826 South Korea.
Ha Rin KimResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences College of Pharmacy Seoul National University Seoul 08826 South Korea.
Tae Hyung WonBoyce Thompson Institute and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology Cornell University Ithaca NY 14853 USA.
Peter DimitrionCenter for Nanomedicine Wilmer Eye Institute and Department of Ophthalmology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD 21231 USA.
Ok-Cheol JeonPharosgen Co. Seoul 06034 South Korea.
Seong Who KimDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul 05505 South Korea.
In-San KimBiomedical Research Institute Korea Institute of Science and Technology Seoul 02792 South Korea.
Sang Yoon KimDepartment of Otolaryngology Asan Medical Center University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul 05505 South Korea.
Youngro ByunResearch Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences College of Pharmacy Seoul National University Seoul 08826 South Korea.
Seoul National University · KRSeoul National University of Science and Technology · KRUlsan College · KRCornell University · USDeargen (South Korea) · KRJohns Hopkins University · USKorea University · KRUniversity of Ulsan · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity is associated with the therapeutic failures of targeted therapies. To overcome such heterogeneity, a novel targeted therapy is proposed that could kill tumor populations with diverse phenotypes by delivering nonselective cytotoxins to target-positive cells as well as to the surrounding tumor cells via a recurrent bystander killing effect. A representative prodrug is prepared that targets integrin αvβ3 and releases cytotoxins upon entering cells or by caspase-3. This allows the prodrug to kill integrin αvβ3-positive cells and upregulate caspase-3, which in turn, activates the prodrug to release a cytotoxin that could subsequently diffuse into and kill the neighboring tumor cells. Apoptotic cells further upregulate and release caspase-3, which activate more prodrugs leading to another round of adjacent cell death and caspase-3 release. Thus, the bystander killing effect could occur repeatedly, leading to augmented and widespread anticancer activity. This strategy provides an avenue that could advance the current targeted therapy.

Indexed as

bystander killing effectscancer therapiescaspasesprodrugstarget therapies

Identifiers

PMID30027061
PMCPMC6051143
OpenAlexW2807478082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.