ArticleCureus2018
The Surgical Management of Pilonidal Disease is Uncertain Because of High Recurrence Rates.
Article in Cureus, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- A mapping review of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Practice patterns of paediatric surgeons on treating pilonidal sinus disease - a national survey study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Article
- Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024Observational
- Pilonidal sinus: an overview of historical and current management modalities.Updates in surgery · 2024Review
- The application of ERAS in pilonidal sinus: comparison of postoperative recovery between primary suture and Limberg flap procedure in a multicenter prospective randomized trial.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- Surgery for pilonidal sinus disease in Norway: training, attitudes and preferences-a survey among Norwegian surgeons.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand.Annals of coloproctology · 2020Article
- Article
- Analysis of the Relapse Rates of the Primary Closure and Limberg Flap Techniques in Pilonidal Sinus Surgery.Cureus · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Pilonidal disease is a common condition with no consensus for the best management of chronic disease or current practice in Australia and New Zealand. Methods A survey was distributed among 190 colorectal and 592 general surgeons in Australia and New Zealand. Data was obtained regarding pilonidal surgery volume, procedures performed, non-operative management and recurrence rates. Three clinical scenarios were also presented. Results The response rate was 58% among colorectal surgeons, 18% among general surgeons. Nineteen percent of surgeons were high-volume (>23 operations per year), 47% low-volume (<12 operations per year). The commonest procedure was the Karydakis procedure (77%), with many others performed including rhomboid flaps (36%), Bascom cleft lift (13%), Z-plasty (7%), and gluteal rotation flaps (5%). Fifty-five percent of high-volume surgeons offered more than one operation while only 16% of low-volume surgeons did. Nineteen percent operated on all patients with pilonidal disease, 89% believing off-midline closure to be superior to midline. Disease extent was the main driver for non-operative management; patient factors such as cosmesis and time-off work being the least important. Sixty-four percent reported recurrence rates above 5%, and 37% recurrence rates >10%. Six percent reported no recurrences ever. Five percent reported recurrence rates over 20%, but 24% stated that over one-fifth of their practice consists of recurrent disease. Conclusions This study reports higher recurrence rates than in published series, suggesting many surgeons do not see their own recurrences, with current treatment not as successful as previously thought. Combined with the widespread variation in practice, optimal management of this disease remains unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.