ReviewJournal of intensive care2018
Continuous EEG monitoring in ICU.
Review in Journal of intensive care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyclic Recurrence of Seizures as a Marker for Super-Refractory Status Epilepticus.Brain and behavior · 2026Article
- Article
- A multi-feature method for real-time seizure detection in pediatric intensive care unit.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Duration of EEG monitoring needed to ensure a low risk of seizure recurrence in hospitalized patients.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Psychomotor Rehabilitation for Pediatric Delirium: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Efficacy and Brain Electrophysiological Mechanisms.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Using artificial intelligence to optimize anti-seizure treatment and EEG-guided decisions in severe brain injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
- Seizure detection with reduced electroencephalogram channels: research trends and outlook.Royal Society open science · 2023Review
- Processed Electroencephalogram-Based Monitoring to Guide Sedation in Critically Ill Adult Patients: Recommendations from an International Expert Panel-Based Consensus.Neurocritical care · 2023Article
- Continuous electroencephalography in the intensive care unit: A critical review and position statement from an Australian and New Zealand perspective.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2023Article
- Efficacy of continuous electroencephalogram for the management of altered mental status in the neurosurgical intensive care unit.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
- The Impact of Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus after Cardiac Surgery on Outcome.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- EEG abnormality as a prognostic factor in cirrhotic patients with Grade III-IV hepatic encephalopathy requiring mechanical ventilation: A retrospective analysis.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2021Article
- A Full-Stack Application for Detecting Seizures and Reducing Data During Continuous Electroencephalogram Monitoring.Critical care explorations · 2021Article
- Early and late-onset nonconvulsive status epilepticus after stroke.Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria · 2021Article
- Efficiency of using a neurofeedback device in determining ischaemic early electroencephalography indicators in rabbits with acute brain ischaemia.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2021Article
- Hyperthermia-Induced Changes in EEG of Anesthetized Mice Subjected to Passive Heat Exposure.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Current Status and Future Directions of Neuromonitoring With Emerging Technologies in Neonatal Care.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Review
- Diagnostic Reliability of Headset-Type Continuous Video EEG Monitoring for Detection of ICU Patterns and NCSE in Patients with Altered Mental Status with Unknown Etiology.Neurocritical care · 2020Article
- Continuous EEG use and status epilepticus treatment in Australasia: a practice survey of Australian and New Zealand epileptologists.BMJ neurology open · 2020Article
- Big data in status epilepticus.Epilepsy & behavior : E&B · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous electroencephalogram (CEEG) monitoring is increasingly being used for brain monitoring in neurocritical care setting. This is because of the proven effectiveness of CEEG in diagnosing nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) as a cause of unexplained consciousness disorder. CEEG has been demonstrated to be effective in determining the response to, and outcome of, NCSE treatment. MAIN BODY: In this review article, the authors described the indication and methods of CEEG and diagnosis based on EEG pattern. As a condition characterized by unexplained consciousness disorder, NCSE is frequently encountered in the neurocritical care setting and is only accompanied by an altered EEG change without any clinically apparent manifestation, such as convulsion. Thus, it is considered a form of status epilepticus manifesting mainly with consciousness disorder. This is a diagnostic challenge but should not be overlooked as NCSE is a curable condition. However, CEEG is required for the correct diagnosis of NCSE, which is difficult to perform in daily clinical practice. There also are several challenges regarding urgent EEG monitoring in the intensive care unit setting, including system-related problems, such as the preparation of mobile EEG devices and collodion-applied electrodes; human resource-related problems, such as staffing of EEG technicians and physicians who can respond flexibly to unscheduled needs; and EEG-specific difficulties in interpretation/diagnosis. These issues preclude the wide spread of CEEG in daily practice.
conclusionRecently, importance of CEEG was well accepted; however, no definitive diagnostic criteria exist for identifying EEG patterns suggestive of NCSE, especially the ambiguous significance of periodic discharges (PDs) further complicates the diagnosis of NCSE. Thus, analyzing the change in EEG patterns over time is important for the correct diagnosis of NCSE. Further studies are needed to collect sufficient CEEG data and assess the outcome of patients who have undergone therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.