ArticleEvolutionary applications2018
Impact of supplementation on deleterious mutation distribution in an exploited salmonid.
Article in Evolutionary applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Otolith and Genomic Data Reveal Temporal Insights Into Stocking Across a Large River Basin in a Mobile, Long-Lived Australian Freshwater Fish Species.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Genomic and environmental influences on resilience in a cold-water fish near the edge of its range.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Hierarchical genetic structure and implications for conservation of the world's largest salmonid, Hucho taimen.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The ghosts of propagation past: haplotype information clarifies the relative influence of stocking history and phylogeographic processes on contemporary population structure of walleye (Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Using multiple sources during reintroduction of a locally extinct population benefits survival and reproduction of an endangered freshwater fish.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Captive-bred Atlantic salmon released into the wild have fewer offspring than wild-bred fish and decrease population productivity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- Past, present and future contributions of evolutionary biology to wildlife forensics, management and conservation.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- From the woods to the halls of science: Louis Bernatchez's contributions to science, wildlife conservation and people.Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Multiple decades of stocking has resulted in limited hatchery introgression in wild brook trout (Evolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations in Landlocked Threespine Stickleback Populations.Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Comparing Pool-seq, Rapture, and GBS genotyping for inferring weak population structure: The American lobster (Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
- Conserving adaptive potential: lessons from Tasmanian devils and their transmissible cancer.Conservation genetics (Print) · 2019Article
- Next-generation conservation genetics and biodiversity monitoring.Evolutionary applications · 2018Article
- Impact of supplementation on deleterious mutation distribution in an exploited salmonid.Evolutionary applications · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deleterious mutations have important implications for the evolutionary trajectories of populations. While several studies recently investigated the dynamics of deleterious mutations in wild populations, no study has yet explored the fate of deleterious mutations in a context of populations managed by supplementation. Here, based on a dataset of nine wild and 15 supplemented Lake Trout populations genotyped at 4,982 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP)s by means of genotype by sequencing (GBS), we explored the effect of supplementation on the frequency of putatively deleterious variants. Three main findings are consequential for the management of fish populations. First, an increase in neutral genetic diversity in stocked populations compared with unstocked ones was observed. Second, putatively deleterious mutations were more likely to be found in unstocked than in stocked populations, suggesting a lower efficiency to purge deleterious mutations in unstocked lakes. Third, a population currently used as a major source for supplementation is characterized by several fixed putatively deleterious alleles. Therefore, other source populations with lower abundance of putatively deleterious mutations should be favored as sources of supplementation. We discuss management implications of our results, especially pertaining to the joint identification of neutral and deleterious mutations that could help refining the choice of source and sink populations for supplementation in order to maximize their evolutionary potential and to limit their mutation load.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.