Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30026790›Full record

ArticleExpert review of ophthalmology2017

Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery: An Evidence-Based Assessment.

Emily M Schehlein, Mona A Kaleem, Ramya Swamy, Osamah J Saeedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Preliminary antifibrotic and vasoconstrictor effects of adrenaline in Schlemm's canal and suprachoroidal minimally invasive glaucoma surgery in primary open-angle glaucoma.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Updates on the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Precision medicine to prevent glaucoma-related blindness.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily M SchehleinUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 419 W Redwood Street, Suite 420, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Mona A KaleemUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 419 W Redwood Street, Suite 420, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Ramya SwamyUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 419 W Redwood Street, Suite 420, Baltimore, MD 21201.
Osamah J SaeediUniversity of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, 419 W Redwood Street, Suite 420, Baltimore, MD 21201.

Funding

Role of Capillary Flow and Autoregulation in Primary Open Angle GlaucomaK23EY025014 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SAEEDI, OSAMAH JAWAID · 2015 to 2019
$1.0M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY025014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe advent of Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) offers a novel approach in the treatment of glaucoma with the number of procedures developing at an exciting pace. AREAS COVERED: MIGS procedures aim to lower intraocular pressure (IOP) via four mechanisms: (1) increasing trabecular outflow, (2) increasing outflow via suprachoroidal shunts, (3) reducing aqueous production, and (4) subconjunctival filtration. A comprehensive search for published studies for each Microinvasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) device or procedure was undertaken using the electronic database PubMed. Search terms included 'minimally invasive glaucoma surgery', 'microincisional glaucoma surgery', and 'microinvasive glaucoma surgery'. A manual search for each device or procedure was also performed. After review, randomized control trials and prospective studies were preferentially included. EXPERT OPINION: These procedures offer several benefits: an improved safety profile allowing for intervention in earlier stages of glaucoma, combination with cataract surgery, and decreased dependence on patient compliance with topical agents. Established MIGS procedures have proven efficacy and more recent devices and procedures show promising results. Despite this, further study is needed to assess the long term IOP-lowering effectiveness of these procedures. Particularly, rigorous study with more randomized control trials and head-to-head comparisons would allow for better informed clinical and surgical decision-making. MIGS offers new solutions for glaucoma treatment.

Indexed as

glaucomamicroinvasiveminimally invasiveproceduressurgical therapy

Identifiers

PMID30026790
PMCPMC6049090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.