Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30026755›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2018

CRISPR/Cascade 9-Mediated Genome Editing-Challenges and Opportunities.

Bhaskar Roy, Jing Zhao, Chao Yang, Wen Luo, Teng Xiong, Yong Li, Xiaodong Fang, Guanjun Gao, Chabungbam O Singh, Lise Madsen and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Alternative Animal Models of Aging Research.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Bhaskar RoyBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Jing ZhaoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Chao YangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Wen LuoBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Teng XiongBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Yong LiBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Xiaodong FangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Guanjun GaoSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Chabungbam O SinghInstitute of Sericulture and Apiculture, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Lise MadsenBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Yong ZhouBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Karsten KristiansenBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clustered Regularly Interspaced Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and Cascade 9 (also known as Cas9, CRISPR associated protein 9) confer protection against invading viruses or plasmids. The CRISPR/Cascade 9 system constitutes one of the most powerful genome technologies available to researchers today. So far, this technology has enabled efficient genome editing and modification in several model organisms and has successfully been used in biomedicine and biomedical engineering. However, challenges for efficient and safe genetic manipulation in several organisms persist. Here, we review functional approaches and future challenges associated with the use of the CRISPR/Cascade 9 genome editing system and discuss opportunities, ethical issues and future directions within this field.

Indexed as

Cascade 9CRISPRgene targetinggenome editingoff-target effectsRNA guided system

Identifiers

PMID30026755
PMCPMC6042012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.