Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30026683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

FES-UPP: A Flexible Functional Electrical Stimulation System to Support Upper Limb Functional Activity Practice.

Mingxu Sun, Christine Smith, David Howard, Laurence Kenney, Helen Luckie, Karen Waring, Paul Taylor, Earl Merson, Stacey Finn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mingxu SunCentre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Christine SmithDepartment of Allied Health Professions, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
David HowardCentre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Laurence KenneyCentre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Helen LuckieCentre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Karen WaringCentre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Paul TaylorThe National Clinical FES Centre, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Earl MersonThe National Clinical FES Centre, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Stacey FinnThe National Clinical FES Centre, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
University of Salford · GBSalisbury District Hospital · GBSheffield Hallam University · GB

Funding

Department of Health II-LB-0313-20002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is good evidence supporting highly intensive, repetitive, activity-focused, voluntary-initiated practice as a key to driving recovery of upper limb function following stroke. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) offers a potential mechanism to efficiently deliver this type of therapy, but current commercial devices are too inflexible and/or insufficiently automated, in some cases requiring engineering support. In this paper, we report a new, flexible upper limb FES system, FES-UPP, which addresses the issues above. The FES-UPP system consists of a 5-channel stimulator running a flexible FES finite state machine (FSM) controller, the associated setup software that guides therapists through the setup of FSM controllers via five setup stages, and finally the Session Manager used to guide the patient in repeated attempts at the activities(s) and provide feedback on their performance. The FSM controller represents a functional activity as a sequence of movement phases. The output for each phase implements the stimulations to one or more muscles. Progression between movement phases is governed by user-defined rules. As part of a clinical investigation of the system, nine therapists used the FES-UPP system to set up FES-supported activities with twenty two patient participants with impaired upper-limbs. Therapists with little or no FES experience and without any programming skills could use the system in their usual clinical settings, without engineering support. Different functional activities, tailored to suit the upper limb impairment levels of each participant were used, in up to 8 sessions of FES-supported therapy per participant. The efficiency of delivery of the therapy using FES-UPP was promising when compared with published data on traditional face-face therapy. The FES-UPP system described in this paper has been shown to allow therapists with little or no FES experience and without any programming skills to set up state-machine FES controllers bespoke to the patient's impairment patterns and activity requirements, without engineering support. The clinical results demonstrated that the system can be used to efficiently deliver high intensity, activity-focused therapy. Nevertheless, further work to reduce setup time is still required.

Indexed as

finite state machine controlfunctional electrical stimulationrehabilitationstrokeupper limb

Identifiers

PMID30026683
PMCPMC6041417
OpenAlexW2808646842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.