ArticleScientific reports2018
Automated flow cytometric identification of disease-specific cells by the ECLIPSE algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Natural Killer Cell Subpopulations and Inhibitory Receptor Dynamics in Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Multi-set Pre-processing of Multicolor Flow Cytometry Data.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multicolor Flow Cytometry (MFC)-based gating allows the selection of cellular (pheno)types based on their unique marker expression. Current manual gating practice is highly subjective and may remove relevant information to preclude discovery of cell populations with specific co-expression of multiple markers. Only multivariate approaches can extract such aspects of cell variability from multi-dimensional MFC data. We describe the novel method ECLIPSE (Elimination of Cells Lying in Patterns Similar to Endogeneity) to identify and characterize aberrant cells present in individuals out of homeostasis. ECLIPSE combines dimensionality reduction by Simultaneous Component Analysis with Kernel Density Estimates. A Difference between Densities (DbD) is used to eliminate cells in responder samples that overlap in marker expression with cells of controls. Thereby, subsequent data analyses focus on the immune response-specific cells, leading to more informative and focused models. To prove the power of ECLIPSE, we applied the method to study two distinct datasets: the in vivo neutrophil response induced by systemic endotoxin challenge and in studying the heterogeneous immune-response of asthmatics. ECLIPSE described the well-characterized common response in the LPS challenge insightfully, while identifying slight differences between responders. Also, ECLIPSE enabled characterization of the immune response associated to asthma, where the co-expressions between all markers were used to stratify patients according to disease-specific cell profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.