Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30026344›Full record

ReviewJournal of cell science2018

The actin cortex at a glance.

Priyamvada Chugh, Ewa K Paluch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cell science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 232 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
232citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

232 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Expulsion of nuclear DNA to the cytoplasm after viral entry: A mechanism for activation of the cGAS pathway.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

172 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priyamvada ChughMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK priyamvada.chugh.12@alumni.ucl.ac.uk e.paluch@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5378-5874
Ewa K PaluchMRC Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK priyamvada.chugh.12@alumni.ucl.ac.uk e.paluch@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-2323

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00012/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12018/5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precisely controlled cell deformations are key to cell migration, division and tissue morphogenesis, and have been implicated in cell differentiation during development, as well as cancer progression. In animal cells, shape changes are primarily driven by the cellular cortex, a thin actomyosin network that lies directly underneath the plasma membrane. Myosin-generated forces create tension in the cortical network, and gradients in tension lead to cellular deformations. Recent studies have provided important insight into the molecular control of cortical tension by progressively unveiling cortex composition and organization. In this Cell Science at a Glance article and the accompanying poster, we review our current understanding of cortex composition and architecture. We then discuss how the microscopic properties of the cortex control cortical tension. While many open questions remain, it is now clear that cortical tension can be modulated through both cortex composition and organization, providing multiple levels of regulation for this key cellular property during cell and tissue morphogenesis.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsAnimalsCell ShapeHumansMyosinsActinsMyosinsActinCell shapeCellular cortexContractilityMechanics

Identifiers

PMID30026344
PMCPMC6080608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.