Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30026176›Full record

ReviewJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Challenges and Potential Opportunities of Mobile Phone Call Detail Records in Health Research: Review.

Kerina Helen Jones, Helen Daniels, Sharon Heys, David Vincent Ford

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Access to Essential Services: A Critical Factor for Predicting Recovery and Quantifying Resilience.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. The Effect of Gun-Free School Zones on Crimes Committed with a Firearm in Saint Louis, Missouri.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kerina Helen JonesData Science Building, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8164-3718
Helen DanielsData Science Building, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-0333
Sharon HeysData Science Building, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3007-644X
David Vincent FordData Science Building, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-721X

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K006525/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCall detail records (CDRs) are collected by mobile network operators in the course of providing their service. CDRs are increasingly being used in research along with other forms of big data and represent an emerging data type with potential for public good. Many jurisdictions have infrastructures for health data research that could benefit from the integration of CDRs with health data.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to review how CDRs have been used in health research and to identify challenges and potential opportunities for their wider use in conjunction with health data.

methodsA literature review was conducted using structured search terms making use of major search engines. Initially, 4066 items were identified. Following screening, 46 full text articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. Information extracted included research topic area, population of study, datasets used, information governance and ethical considerations, study findings, and data limitations.

resultsThe majority of published studies were focused on low-income and middle-income countries. Making use of the location element in CDRs, studies often modeled the transmission of infectious diseases or estimated population movement following natural disasters with a view to implementing interventions. CDRs were used in anonymized or aggregated form, and the process of gaining regulatory approvals varied with data provider and by jurisdiction. None included public views on the use of CDRs in health research.

conclusionsDespite various challenges and limitations, anonymized mobile phone CDRs have been used successfully in health research. The use of aggregated data is a safeguard but also a further limitation. Greater opportunities could be gained if validated anonymized CDRs were integrated with routine health records at an individual level, provided that permissions and safeguards could be put in place. Further work is needed, including gaining public views, to develop an ethically founded framework for the use of CDRs in health research.

Indexed as

call detail recordshealth researchmobile phone data

Identifiers

PMID30026176
PMCPMC6072975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.