Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30025939›Full record

SynthesisJournal of pain and symptom management2018

Advance Care Planning With Patients Who Have End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Realist Review.

Peter O'Halloran, Helen Noble, Kelly Norwood, Peter Maxwell, Joanne Shields, Damian Fogarty, Fliss Murtagh, Rachael Morton, Kevin Brazil

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Breaking Through the Glass Ceiling-HavingThe Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter O'HalloranSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom. Electronic address: p.ohalloran@qub.ac.uk.
Helen NobleSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Kelly NorwoodSchool of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine Campus, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
Peter MaxwellSchool of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Health Sciences Building, Belfast, United Kingdom; Regional Nephrology Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Joanne ShieldsRegional Nephrology Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Damian FogartyRegional Nephrology Unit, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Fliss MurtaghWolfson Palliative Care Research Centre, Hull York Medical School, Allam Medical Building, University of Hull, Hull, United Kingdom.
Rachael MortonSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kevin BrazilSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_15025The Dunhill Medical Trust R428/0715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPatients with end-stage kidney disease have a high mortality rate and disease burden. Despite this, many do not speak with health care professionals about end-of-life issues. Advance care planning is recommended in this context but is complex and challenging. We carried out a realist review to identify factors affecting its implementation.

objectivesThe objectives of this study are 1) to identify implementation theories; 2) to identify factors that help or hinder implementation; and 3) to develop theory on how the intervention may work.

methodsWe carried out a systematic realist review, searching seven electronic databases: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect.

resultsSixty-two papers were included in the review.

conclusionWe identified two intervention stages-1) training for health care professionals that addresses concerns, optimizes skills, and clarifies processes and 2) use of documentation and processes that are simple, individually tailored, culturally appropriate, and involve surrogates. These processes work as patients develop trust in professionals, participate in discussions, and clarify values and beliefs about their condition. This leads to greater congruence between patients and surrogates; increased quality of communication between patients and professionals; and increased completion of advance directives. Advance care planning is hindered by lack of training; administrative complexities; pressures of routine care; patients overestimating life expectancy; and when patients, family, and/or clinical staff are reluctant to initiate discussions. It is more likely to succeed where organizations treat it as core business; when the process is culturally appropriate and takes account of patient perceptions; and when patients are willing to consider death and dying with suitably trained staff.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningKidney Failure, ChronicHumansadvance care planningadvance directiveschronickidney failurepalliative carerealist reviewrenal dialysis

Identifiers

PMID30025939
PMCPMC6203056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.