Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30025499›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2019

A novel measure of drug benefit-risk assessment based on Scale Loss Score.

Gaelle Saint-Hilary, Veronique Robert, Mauro Gasparini, Thomas Jaki, Pavel Mozgunov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gaelle Saint-Hilary1 Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche (DISMA) Giuseppe Luigi Lagrange, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1643-3348
Veronique Robert2 Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier (IRIS), Suresnes, France.
Mauro Gasparini1 Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche (DISMA) Giuseppe Luigi Lagrange, Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Thomas Jaki3 Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Pavel Mozgunov3 Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.

Funding

Department of Health SRF-2015-08-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative methods have been proposed to assess and compare the benefit-risk balance of treatments. Among them, multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is a popular decision tool as it permits to summarise the benefits and the risks of a drug in a single utility score, accounting for the preferences of the decision-makers. However, the utility score is often derived using a linear model which might lead to counter-intuitive conclusions; for example, drugs with no benefit or extreme risk could be recommended. Moreover, it assumes that the relative importance of benefits against risks is constant for all levels of benefit or risk, which might not hold for all drugs. We propose Scale Loss Score (SLoS) as a new tool for the benefit-risk assessment, which offers the same advantages as the linear multicriteria decision analysis utility score but has, in addition, desirable properties permitting to avoid recommendations of non-effective or extremely unsafe treatments, and to tolerate larger increases in risk for a given increase in benefit when the amount of benefit is small than when it is high. We present an application to a real case study on telithromycin in Community Acquired Pneumonia and Acute Bacterial Sinusitis, and we investigated the patterns of behaviour of Scale Loss Score, as compared to the linear multicriteria decision analysis, in a comprehensive simulation study.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesAcute DiseaseAnti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsComputer SimulationHumansKetolidesPneumoniaRisk AssessmentSinusitisAnti-Bacterial AgentsKetolidestelithromycinBenefit–riskbounds penalisationdecision-makingloss scoremulticriteria decision analysis

Identifiers

PMID30025499
PMCPMC6728751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.