Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024988›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2018

Cancer as the "perfect storm"? A qualitative study of public attitudes to health conditions.

Liz Morrell, Suzanne Sayuri Ii, Sarah Wordsworth, Roger Wilson, Sian Rees, Richard Barker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liz MorrellOxford-UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), Radcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6382-1795
Suzanne Sayuri IiOxford-UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), Radcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Sarah WordsworthHealth Economics Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Roger WilsonNational Cancer Research Institute Consumer Forum London UK.
Sian ReesHealth Experiences Institute, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences University of Oxford Oxford UK.
Richard BarkerOxford-UCL Centre for the Advancement of Sustainable Medical Innovation (CASMI), Radcliffe Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK.
University of Oxford · GBNational Cancer Research Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsOur aim is to identify important attributes of major diseases that shape how they are perceived by the public. METHODS AND

resultsFour focus groups among members of the public were recruited, in March and October 2016, and used semistructured discussion to explore important attributes of cancer, heart disease, stroke, dementia, mental illness, and infectious disease. Common themes were identified by using inductive thematic analysis.Five themes were identified: fear, impact on family and friends, hope, detection, and prevention. Fear of cancer includes not only fear of death but also of aggressive treatments. Loss of dignity is feared in dementia, while infectious disease raises fear of uncontrollable "plague"; in contrast, people with mental illness may themselves be seen as a potential threat. The impact of cancer and its treatment on family and friends was described as intense and all-consuming, even for those not involved directly in caring; with dementia and stroke, the family impact is taking on care, including funding, over the long term with little expectation of improvement. Hope is a major theme in cancer and stroke recovery, linked with the need to take action, often expressed in aggressive language of "fighting," but seen as futile in dementia. Detection difficulties for "silent" cancers mean that real treatment opportunities are missed; cardiovascular and infection risk, however, are seen as easy to identify and act on, whereas mental illness and dementia are seen as poorly diagnosed and with limited treatment options. Prevention awareness is high for cardiovascular disease and infection, lower for cancer, and limited for dementia and mental health.

conclusionAlthough themes overlap across diseases, the specific concerns are different and each condition has a unique profile. Quantifying the relative importance of these themes could allow their incorporation in decision-making, not only when they occur as a named disease but also in any relevant condition.

Indexed as

cancerdementiafearhopepublic attitudesqualitative

Identifiers

PMID30024988
PMCPMC6034427
OpenAlexW2765738874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.