Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024919›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Effects of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis cotton on insecticide use, heliothine counts, plant damage, and cotton yield: A meta-analysis, 1996-2015.

Daniel Fleming, Fred Musser, Dominic Reisig, Jeremy Greene, Sally Taylor, Megha Parajulee, Gus Lorenz, Angus Catchot, Jeffrey Gore, David Kerns and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Optimizing Rearing ofInsects · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Sequencing and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cry1Ba1-mediated toxicity of transgenicFrontiers in insect science · 2023
    Article
  11. Genetic Modification ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Exploitation of NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Daniel FlemingMississippi State University, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State, MS, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4637-1822
Fred MusserMississippi State University, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State, MS, United States of America.
Dominic ReisigNorth Carolina State University, Vernon G. James Research and Extension Center, Plymouth, NC, United States of America.
Jeremy GreeneClemson University, Edisto Research and Education Center, Blackville, SC, United States of America.
Sally TaylorVirginia Tech, Tidewater Agricultural Research and Extension Center, Suffolk, VA, United States of America.
Megha ParajuleeTexas A&M University, AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Lubbock, TX, United States of America.
Gus LorenzUniversity of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service, Lonoke Extension Center, Lonoke, AR, United States of America.
Angus CatchotMississippi State University, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State, MS, United States of America.
Jeffrey GoreMississippi State University Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, United States of America.
David KernsTexas A&M University Department of Entomology, College Station, TX, United States of America.
Scott StewartThe University of Tennessee, West Tennessee Research and Education Center, Jackson, TN, United States of America.
Deborah BoykinUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, James Whitten Delta States Research Center, Stoneville, MS, United States of America.
Michael CaprioMississippi State University, Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State, MS, United States of America.
Nathan LittleUnited States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Southern Insect Management Research Unit, Stoneville, MS, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary management tactic for lepidopteran pests of cotton in the United States of America (USA) is the use of transgenic cotton that produces Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner (Bt) toxins. The primary target pests of this technology are Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) and Heliothis virescens (F.) in the eastern and central Cotton Belt of the USA. Concerns over the evolution of resistance in H. zea to Bt toxins and scrutiny of the necessity of Bt crops has escalated. We reviewed published and unpublished data from field trials of Bt cotton in the eastern and central Cotton Belt of the USA through 2015 to evaluate the effectiveness of Bt cotton (Bollgard, Bollgard II, WideStrike, WideStrike 3, and TwinLink). Bt cotton reduced insecticide usage, reduced heliothine pest numbers and damage, and provided a yield benefit, but Bollgard II and WideStrike efficacy declined in the Midsouth over the period evaluated. In the Southeastern region, heliothine damage remained constant through 2015, but yield benefits declined from 2010 until 2015. Resistance of H. zea to several Bt toxins is the most plausible explanation for the observed changes in Bt cotton efficacy. The introduction of new Bt toxins such as found in Widestrike 3 and Twinlink may preserve the benefits of Bt crops. However, while both Widestrike 3 and Twinlink had less damage than Widestrike, damage levels of both were similar to Bollgard II.

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisCrops, AgriculturalMothsPlants, Genetically ModifiedAnimalsBacterial ProteinsInsect ControlInsecticide ResistanceInsecticidesPest Control, BiologicalUnited StatesBacterial ProteinsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID30024919
PMCPMC6053876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.