Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024861›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical investigation2018

Th1 memory differentiates recombinant from live herpes zoster vaccines.

Myron J Levin, Miranda E Kroehl, Michael J Johnson, Andrew Hammes, Dominik Reinhold, Nancy Lang, Adriana Weinberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antigen-specific TScience advances · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A vaccine against cytomegalovirus: how close are we?The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Myron J LevinDepartment of Pediatrics, and.
Miranda E KroehlDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, and.
Michael J JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, and.
Andrew HammesDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, and.
Dominik ReinholdDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado School of Public Health, and.
Nancy LangDepartment of Pediatrics, and.
Adriana WeinbergDepartment of Pediatrics, and.
Pediatrics and Genetics · USColorado School of Public Health · US

Funding

Systems Biological Analysis of Innate and Adaptive Responses to VaccinationU19AI090023 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, LI, SHUZHAO · 2010 to 2021
$45.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adjuvanted varicella-zoster virus (VZV) glycoprotein E (gE) subunit herpes zoster vaccine (HZ/su) confers higher protection against HZ than the live attenuated zoster vaccine (ZV). To understand the immunologic basis for the different efficacies of the vaccines, we compared immune responses to the vaccines in adults 50 to 85 years old. gE-specific T cells were very low/undetectable before vaccination when analyzed by FluoroSpot and flow cytometry. Both ZV and HZ/su increased gE-specific responses, but at peak memory response (PMR) after vaccination (30 days after ZV or after the second dose of HZ/su), gE-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were 10-fold or more higher in HZ/su compared with ZV recipients. Comparing the vaccines, T cell memory responses, including gE-IL-2+ and VZV-IL-2+ spot-forming cells (SFCs), were higher in HZ/su recipients and cytotoxic and effector responses were lower. At 1 year after vaccination, all gE-Th1 and VZV-IL-2+ SFCs remained higher in HZ/su compared with ZV recipients. Mediation analyses showed that IL-2+ PMR were necessary for the persistence of Th1 responses to either vaccine and VZV-IL-2+ PMR explained 73% of the total effect of HZ/su on persistence. This emphasizes the biological importance of the memory responses, which were clearly superior in HZ/su compared with ZV participants.

Indexed as

Immunologic MemoryVaccinationAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleHerpesvirus 3, HumanHerpes ZosterHerpes Zoster VaccineHumansMaleMiddle AgedTh1 CellsVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticAntibodies, ViralHerpes Zoster VaccineVaccines, AttenuatedVaccines, SyntheticAdaptive immunityInfectious diseaseVaccines

Identifiers

PMID30024861
PMCPMC6159998
OpenAlexW2884143678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.