Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024794›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2018

Medicaid Expansion as an Employment Incentive Program for People With Disabilities.

Jean P Hall, Adele Shartzer, Noelle K Kurth, Kathleen C Thomas

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Psychiatric Crisis Care and the More is Less Paradox.Community mental health journal · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jean P HallJean P. Hall is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, and the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence. Adele Shartzer is with the Urban Institute, Washington, DC. Noelle K. Kurth is with the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas. Kathleen C. Thomas is with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Adele ShartzerJean P. Hall is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, and the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence. Adele Shartzer is with the Urban Institute, Washington, DC. Noelle K. Kurth is with the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas. Kathleen C. Thomas is with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Noelle K KurthJean P. Hall is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, and the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence. Adele Shartzer is with the Urban Institute, Washington, DC. Noelle K. Kurth is with the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas. Kathleen C. Thomas is with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Kathleen C ThomasJean P. Hall is with the Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, and the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas, Lawrence. Adele Shartzer is with the Urban Institute, Washington, DC. Noelle K. Kurth is with the Institute for Health and Disability Policy Studies, University of Kansas. Kathleen C. Thomas is with the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), many Americans with disabilities were locked into poverty to maintain eligibility for Medicaid coverage. US Medicaid expansion under the ACA allows individuals to qualify for coverage without first going through a disability determination process and declaring an inability to work to obtain Supplemental Security Income. Medicaid expansion coverage also allows for greater income and imposes no asset tests. In this article, we share updates to our previous work documenting greater employment among people with disabilities living in Medicaid expansion states. Over time (2013-2017), the trends in employment among individuals with disabilities living in Medicaid expansion states have become significant, indicating a slow but steady progression toward employment for this group post-ACA. In effect, Medicaid expansion coverage is acting as an employment incentive program for people with disabilities. These findings have broad policy implications in light of recent changes regarding imposition of work requirements for Medicaid programs.

Indexed as

EmploymentMedicaidMotivationPersons with DisabilitiesEligibility DeterminationHealth PolicyHumansInsurance CoveragePatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPublic HealthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID30024794
PMCPMC6085052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.