Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024576›Full record

ArticleRetina (Philadelphia, Pa.)2019

AMPLITUDE LOSS OF THE HIGH-FREQUENCY FLICKER ELECTRORETINOGRAM IN EARLY DIABETIC RETINOPATHY.

J Jason McAnany, Jason C Park, Felix Y Chau, Yannek I Leiderman, Jennifer I Lim, Norman P Blair

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Rod photoreceptor activation and deactivation in early-stage diabetic eye disease.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Jason McAnanyDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and.
Jason C ParkDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and.
Felix Y ChauDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and.
Yannek I LeidermanDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and.
Jennifer I LimDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and.
Norman P BlairDepartments of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, and.
University of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
Mechanisms of Early Functional Loss in Diabetic Eye DiseaseR01EY026004 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI James JASON McAnany · 2016 to 2026
$4.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate retinal dysfunction in diabetic patients who have mild or no nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (DR) using the high-frequency flicker electroretinogram.

methodsLight-adapted flicker electroretinograms were recorded from 15 diabetic patients who have no clinically apparent retinopathy, 15 diabetic patients who have mild nonproliferative DR, and 15 nondiabetic, age-equivalent controls. Electroretinograms were elicited by full-field flicker at 2 temporal frequencies, 31.25 and 62.5 Hz, and were recorded using conventional techniques. Amplitude and timing of the flicker responses were compared among the groups and correlated with clinical characteristics including age, acuity, disease duration, and HbA1c.

resultsThe 31.25-Hz flicker amplitude was slightly, but nonsignificantly, smaller for subjects with no DR and mild nonproliferative DR , compared with the control group (both t < 1.38, P > 0.31); small, nonsignificant response delays for both patient groups were also observed (both t < 1.57, P > 0.12). By contrast, there were significant amplitude reductions for the 62.5-Hz flicker stimulus: mean amplitude was reduced by 32% for subjects with no DR and by 41% for subjects with mild nonproliferative DR (both t > 2.92 and P < 0.01). Response timing at 62.5 Hz did not differ significantly from control for either group (both t < 1.2 and P > 0.39). Electroretinogram amplitude and timing were not correlated significantly with clinical characteristics.

conclusionThe 62.5-Hz flicker electroretinogram is useful for evaluating retinal dysfunction in diabetic patients who have mild or no DR because this response can be significantly reduced. Attenuation of the high-frequency flicker electroretinogram, which is primarily generated by bipolar cells, suggests a relatively early retinal site of neural dysfunction.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyElectroretinographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationRetina

Identifiers

PMID30024576
PMCPMC6335196
OpenAlexW2883835250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.