SynthesisMedicine2018
Adjuvant treatment with Yupingfeng formula for primary nephrotic syndrome in children: A PRISMA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic effect of Yupingfeng powder and its bioactive metabolites on renal diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Associations Between Cessation of Second-Line Therapies and Relapse Rates of Childhood Refractory Minimal-Change Nephrotic Syndrome: A Single-Center, Retrospective Chart Review.Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental · 2022Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Adjuvant Treatment of Primary Nephrotic Syndrome in Pediatric Patients with Chinese Medicine.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Effects of Yu-ping-feng granules combined with loratadine tablets on treatment efficacy and immune factor levels in allergic rhinitis patients.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundYupingfeng formula (YPFF) has been prescribed as adjuvant treatment for pediatric patients with primary nephrotic syndrome (PNS) in China for years. However, the efficacy and adverse effects of these formulations are controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed to evaluate the benefits and harms of YPFF in treating PNS in children.
methodsThe MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, WanFang, and CBM databases were searched for RCTs comparing therapies with and without YPFF for PNS from inception to May 13, 2017. Relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were expressed for dichotomous outcomes, and weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Cochrane collaboration tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of methodologies.
resultsEight studies with 538 participants were identified. Treatment with YPFF significantly increased serum levels of IgA (WMD, 0.48, 95% CI, 0.40-0.56, P < .001), IgG (WMD, 3.36, 95% CI, 2.61-4.12, P < .001), CD4 T-lymphocytes (WMD, 3.35, 95% CI, 2.26-4.43, P < .001), but decreased the level of CD8 T-lymphocytes (WMD, -3.38, 95% CI -5.48 to -1.28, P = .002). YPFF also increased the rates of complete remission (RR: 1.35, 95% CI, 1.09-1.67, P = .005), and decreased the rates of relapse (RR: 0.57, 95% CI, 0.45-0.71, P < .001), and infection (RR: 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.83, P < .001). There was no significant difference in the level of IgM between the groups (WMD, 0.12, 95% CI -0.11-0.35, P = .322).
conclusionsYPFF could improve total remission rate and decrease the frequency of relapse and infection rate. The beneficial influence of YPFF may be associated with its immunomodulatory effects. More high-quality studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further identify its efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.