Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024558›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

A meta-analysis supports core needle biopsy by radiologists for better histological diagnosis in soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

Tadahiko Kubo, Taisuke Furuta, Muhammad P Johan, Tomohiko Sakuda, Mitsuo Ochi, Nobuo Adachi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. ISUOG/ESGO Consensus Statement on ultrasound-guided biopsy in gynecological oncology.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of Ewing sarcoma (Spanish Sarcoma Research Group-GEIS).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Bone Biopsies: Practical Considerations and Technical Tips.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Review of Core Biopsies in Musculoskeletal Oncology.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Primary thyroid chondrosarcoma: a case report of an extremely rare malignancy.Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Percutaneous Image-guided Needle Biopsy of Musculoskeletal Tumors: Technical Tips.Interventional radiology (Higashimatsuyama-shi (Japan) · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tadahiko KuboDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Taisuke Furuta
Muhammad P Johan
Tomohiko Sakuda
Mitsuo Ochi
Nobuo Adachi
Hiroshima University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough surgical biopsy has historically been considered to be the standard diagnostic biopsy for soft tissue and bone sarcomas, recent literature suggests that percutaneous core needle biopsy yields similar results. Therefore, an evaluation of the exact diagnostic accuracy and associated influential variables of core needle biopsy that is based on a large data set would be useful.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and EMBASE to identify core needle biopsy studies for predicting final histological subtypes of musculoskeletal lesions. The diagnostic accuracies of core needle biopsy and of surgical biopsy were assessed and compared by using random-effect meta-analyses. The factors relevant to diagnostic accuracy were evaluated by meta-regression and subgroup analyses.

resultsWe selected 32 studies comprising 7209 musculoskeletal lesions. The pooled proportion estimate for the diagnostic accuracy of core needle biopsy was 0.84 (95% confidential interval, CI: 0.81-0.87), which indicated an approximate 84% concordance between core needle biopsy results and final histological diagnoses. The findings of meta-regression and subgroup analyses suggested that radiologists were better core needle biopsy operators than surgeons. An additional meta-analysis for direct comparison between core needle biopsy and surgical biopsy demonstrated that diagnostic accuracy was significantly lower for core needle biopsy than for surgical (pooled odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.20-0.76).

conclusionOur results suggested that core needle biopsy should be performed by expert radiologists and that surgical biopsy should be performed if diagnosis following core needle biopsy does not match the clinical presentation and radiographic findings.

Indexed as

Biopsy, Large-Core NeedleBone NeoplasmsHumansRadiologistsSoft Tissue NeoplasmsSurgeons

Identifiers

PMID30024558
PMCPMC6086481
OpenAlexW2884355180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.