ArticleMedicine2018
Using the recurrence risk score by Joensuu to assess patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with adjuvant imatinib: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance of Survival Prediction Tools in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Rectovaginal extragastrointestinal stromal tumour (EGIST): an additional entity to be considered in the differential diagnosis of tumours of the rectovaginal septum.BMJ case reports · 2021Review
- Gastrointestinal stromal tumor presenting as a rectovaginal septal mass: A case report and review of literature.Medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2014, Joensuu and colleagues devised the first recurrence risk score (RRS) to identify the risk factors for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) recurrence. However, there are scarce data available on RRS effectiveness and efficiency. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to validate Joensuu's RRS in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib.In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from patients with GIST who were treated with adjuvant imatinib between December 2005 and May 2017 in the West China Hospital. The study consisted of 137 patients, after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was the primary end point.The RRSs for 137 patients were divided into 3 groups: low (n = 46), medium (n = 48), and high (n = 43). The RFSs of the 3 groups were significantly different (P < .001). In patients who received adjuvant imatinib for <36 months, the RFS difference was also significant (P < .001), and the result was similar in patients treated with adjuvant imatinib for ≥36 months (P = .03). The area under the curve of the RRS was 0.84 ([95% confidence interval] 0.76-0.92, P < .001), suggesting that the RRS method could accurately assess recurrence risks for patients with GIST who were treated with adjuvant imatinib.It is appropriate to apply the RRS method to assess recurrence risks for patients with GIST who were treated with adjuvant imatinib. A longer adjuvant imatinib duration is recommended for high-risk patients with GIST. It is also important to identify a more effective treatment for patients who are resistant to imatinib.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.