Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024503›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Hunter syndrome in Spain: A Delphi consensus.

Luis González-Gutiérrez-Solana, Encarnación Guillén-Navarro, Mireia Del Toro, Jaime Dalmau, Antonio González-Meneses, María L Couce

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational StudyConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Luis González-Gutiérrez-SolanaConsulta de Neurodegenerativas, Sección de Neurología Pediátrica, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús Sección de Genética Médica, Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, Murcia; Grupo Clínico vinculado al Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), Madrid Servicio de Neurología Pediátrica, Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebrón, Vall d'Hebrón, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona Unidad de Nutrición y Metabolopatías. Hospital Infantil La Fe. Valencia Unidad de Dismorfología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla Metabolic Unit, Service of Neonatology. Department of Pediatrics. Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, IDIS, CIBERER, ISCIII, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Encarnación Guillén-Navarro
Mireia Del Toro
Jaime Dalmau
Antonio González-Meneses
María L Couce
Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús · ESHospital Materno-Infantil · ESHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hunter syndrome or mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPSII) is a progressive multisystem X-linked lysosomal storage disease caused by mutations in the IDS gene that shows a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms and severity. Idursulfase, a specific enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for MPSII, has been available since 2007. ERT, along with symptomatic management of patients, is fundamental for improving patient prognosis and quality of life. The aims of this study were to investigate whether Spanish pediatricians who are experts in managing the disease agreed with current international guidelines regarding MPSII patient diagnosis and follow-up; and to reach a consensus regarding which items are essential for the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of these patients in Spain.An advisory panel of 5 experts from the Hunter Spanish Working Group reviewed key studies, developed a questionnaire based on a modified Delphi method, sent the questionnaire to selected experts, and reviewed the responses. The final questionnaire had 83 items in the following categories: diagnosis, ERT considerations after diagnosis, Periodic assessments, and ERT considerations during follow-up. A total of 85 experts were invited to participate; 28 (35%) responded and showed a strong consensus for most items. The advisory panel decided not to perform a second Delphi round. There was strong agreement (>3.1 median value; range, 1 to 4) for 43/56 items in Diagnosis, for 4/6 items in "ERT considerations after diagnosis," for 6/16 items in "Periodic assessments," and for 3/5 items in "ERT considerations during follow-up." Most responses were in agreement with international guidelines, and controversial items were discussed by the advisory panel. Based on the results, on the key studies, and on clinical experience and opinions, the panel developed and scheduled recommendations for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MPSII.An expert 5-person panel oversaw a Delphi survey of 28 pediatricians and reached a consensus on recommendations for the diagnosis and follow-up of MPSII patients. This document will help guide clinicians involved in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of MPSII.

Indexed as

Delphi TechniqueEnzyme Replacement TherapyFollow-Up StudiesGuideline AdherenceHumansMucopolysaccharidosis IIPediatriciansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'SpainSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30024503
PMCPMC6086518
OpenAlexW2883541888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.