Observational studyMedicine2018
Diagnosis and follow-up of patients with Hunter syndrome in Spain: A Delphi consensus.
Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Harmonizing Perspectives on MPS II Care in Türkiye: A Delphi Study Towards Treatment Management Consensus.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis type II (Hunter syndrome): a Delphi derived practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hunter syndrome or mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPSII) is a progressive multisystem X-linked lysosomal storage disease caused by mutations in the IDS gene that shows a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms and severity. Idursulfase, a specific enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for MPSII, has been available since 2007. ERT, along with symptomatic management of patients, is fundamental for improving patient prognosis and quality of life. The aims of this study were to investigate whether Spanish pediatricians who are experts in managing the disease agreed with current international guidelines regarding MPSII patient diagnosis and follow-up; and to reach a consensus regarding which items are essential for the diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of these patients in Spain.An advisory panel of 5 experts from the Hunter Spanish Working Group reviewed key studies, developed a questionnaire based on a modified Delphi method, sent the questionnaire to selected experts, and reviewed the responses. The final questionnaire had 83 items in the following categories: diagnosis, ERT considerations after diagnosis, Periodic assessments, and ERT considerations during follow-up. A total of 85 experts were invited to participate; 28 (35%) responded and showed a strong consensus for most items. The advisory panel decided not to perform a second Delphi round. There was strong agreement (>3.1 median value; range, 1 to 4) for 43/56 items in Diagnosis, for 4/6 items in "ERT considerations after diagnosis," for 6/16 items in "Periodic assessments," and for 3/5 items in "ERT considerations during follow-up." Most responses were in agreement with international guidelines, and controversial items were discussed by the advisory panel. Based on the results, on the key studies, and on clinical experience and opinions, the panel developed and scheduled recommendations for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with MPSII.An expert 5-person panel oversaw a Delphi survey of 28 pediatricians and reached a consensus on recommendations for the diagnosis and follow-up of MPSII patients. This document will help guide clinicians involved in the diagnosis, management, and treatment of MPSII.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.