Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024500›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2018

Gemstone spectral imaging in lung cancer: A preliminary study.

Yulin Jia, Xigang Xiao, Qiulian Sun, Huijie Jiang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yulin JiaDepartment of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xigang Xiao
Qiulian Sun
Huijie Jiang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the application of gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) for multi-parameter quantitative measurement in lung cancer.The study retrospectively enrolled 30 patients with lung cancer who underwent chest contrast enhanced CT scan with GSI mode. The GSI viewer was used for image display and data analysis. Optimal energy value, CT values at 40 keV, 70 keV and optimal energy level, spectral curve slope, effective atomic number (Zeff), iodine concentration (IC), and water concentration (WC) at the region of interest were measured and analyzed by statistical methods.The optimal energy value for optimal contrast-to-noise ratio on plain scan, arterial phase and venous phase was 62.2 ± 5.38 keV, 50.63 ± 3.84 keV, and 52.5 ± 3.7 keV, respectively. There were significant differences in CT values at different energy levels on each scan phase (P = .033). The spectral curve slope values among 40 to 70 keV, 40 to 100 keV, and 40 to 140 keV were significantly different (P < .001). No significant difference with the slope between arterial phase and venous phase at each energy level interval was observed. Zeff on plain scan, arterial phase, and venous phase was 7.75 ± 0.15, 8.38 ± 0.37, and 8.38 ± 0.30, respectively. Positive correlation was observed among IC, normalized IC, and Zeff on enhanced scan.Multiparameter of GSI can be used for lung tumor lesion evaluation. Different parameters were correlated and provide multiple qualitative and quantitative information together.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLungLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID30024500
PMCPMC6086553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.