ReviewMedicine2018
Antiarrhythmic drug-induced smell and taste disturbances: A case report and literature review.
Review in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Olfactory dysfunction and increased systemic immune inflammation index in patients with atrial fibrillation.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2026Article
- ActSeek: fast and accurate search algorithm of active sites in alphafold database.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Drug-induced Tongue Disorders: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Current drug safety · 2025Review
- International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022Review
- Anosmia: A review in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 and orofacial pain.Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) · 2020Review
- Oral adverse effects of drugs: Taste disorders.Oral diseases · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleMetoprolol and amiodarone are common antiarrhythmic drugs used in clinics throughout the world. The taste and smell alterations induced by antiarrhythmic drugs remain uncommon throughout the world, with less than 10 reported cases. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this case report, we describe a case of a 73-year-old female, diagnosed with arrhythmias, was treated for metoprolol. At the third week of metoprolol treatment, the patient noticed a qualitative change in her ability to smell, also called dysosmia. After the metoprolol was tapered, her ability to smell was recovered. However, her arrhythmia was getting worse and the patient was given amiodarone. After using amiodarone for about 2 weeks, the patient felt hypogeusia, or loss of taste sensation. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed as dysosmia and taste disturbance induced by the antiarrhythmic drugs.
interventionsAfter noticed the side effects of the antiarrhythmic drugs, we asked the patient to abandon the drugs and have a radiofrequency ablation. OUTCOMES: Her ability of smell and taste were recovered after withdrawing the antiarrhythmic drugs. Also, in the follow-up appointment, she reported no complaints of smell or taste anymore. LESSONS: These rare sensory disorders induced by anti-arrhythmic drugs were less documented in past literature. Our case report describes a patient with an arrhythmia who suffered reversible dysosmia and hypogeusia after taking metoprolol and amiodarone, respectively. We conclude that smell and taste disorders should be made aware to patients during the anti-arrhythmic treatment, helping to promote the safety of patients and drug compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.