ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2019
Dynamics of brain activity reveal a unitary recognition signal.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Can Systematic Drift Rate Variability Replace Random Variability in the Diffusion Decision Model?Computational brain & behavior · 2026Article
- The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2024Article
- EEG decoders track memory dynamics.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Measuring memory is harder than you think: How to avoid problematic measurement practices in memory research.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Review
- EEG biomarkers of free recall.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Neural measures of subsequent memory reflect endogenous variability in cognitive function.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dual-process models of recognition memory typically assume that independent familiarity and recollection signals with distinct temporal profiles can each lead to recognition (enabling 2 routes to recognition), whereas single-process models posit a unitary "memory strength" signal. Using multivariate classifiers trained on spectral electroencephalogram (EEG) features, we quantified neural evidence for recognition decisions as a function of time. Classifiers trained on a small portion of the decision period performed similarly to those also incorporating information from previous time points indicating that neural activity reflects an integrated evidence signal. We propose a single-route account of recognition memory that is compatible with contributions from familiarity and recollection signals, but relies on a unitary evidence signal that integrates all available evidence. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.