Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024252›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2019

The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation.

Matthew Goldrick, Rhonda McClain, Emily Cibelli, Yossi Adi, Erin Gustafson, Cornelia Moers, Joseph Keshet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew GoldrickDepartment of Linguistics.ORCID 0000-0002-2035-416X
Rhonda McClainDepartment of Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese.
Emily CibelliDepartment of Linguistics.
Yossi AdiDepartment of Computer Science.
Erin GustafsonDepartment of Linguistics.
Cornelia MoersMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.
Joseph KeshetDepartment of Computer Science.ORCID 0000-0003-2332-5783

Funding

Phonetic echoes of cognitive disruptions in speech productionR21HD077140 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GOLDRICK, MATTHEW A · 2014 to 2015
$394k
Max Planck International Research Network on Aging (MaxNetAging)National Institutes of Health; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R21 HD077140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactive models of language production predict that it should be possible to observe long-distance interactions; effects that arise at one level of processing influence multiple subsequent stages of representation and processing. We examine the hypothesis that disruptions arising in nonform-based levels of planning-specifically, lexical selection-should modulate articulatory processing. A novel automatic phonetic analysis method was used to examine productions in a paradigm yielding both general disruptions to formulation processes and, more specifically, overt errors during lexical selection. This analysis method allowed us to examine articulatory disruptions at multiple levels of analysis, from whole words to individual segments. Baseline performance by young adults was contrasted with young speakers' performance under time pressure (which previous work has argued increases interaction between planning and articulation) and performance by older adults (who may have difficulties inhibiting nontarget representations, leading to heightened interactive effects). The results revealed the presence of interactive effects. Our new analysis techniques revealed these effects were strongest in initial portions of responses, suggesting that speech is initiated as soon as the first segment has been planned. Interactive effects did not increase under response pressure, suggesting interaction between planning and articulation is relatively fixed. Unexpectedly, lexical selection disruptions appeared to yield some degree of facilitation in articulatory processing (possibly reflecting semantic facilitation of target retrieval) and older adults showed weaker, not stronger interactive effects (possibly reflecting weakened connections between lexical and form-level representations). (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

PhoneticsPsycholinguisticsSpeechAdolescentAgedAgingAssociationFemaleHumansInhibition, PsychologicalMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, VisualReadingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30024252
PMCPMC6339616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.