Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30024190›Full record

ArticlePsychological services2020

Development of the Perceived Access Inventory: A patient-centered measure of access to mental health care.

Jeffrey M Pyne, P Adam Kelly, Ellen P Fischer, Christopher J Miller, Patricia Wright, Kara Zamora, Christopher J Koenig, Regina Stanley, Karen Seal, James F Burgess and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological services, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "Hit or Miss": Rural Veterans' Experiences Receiving Community Mental Health Care.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Development and calibration data for the Healthcare Access Item Bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jeffrey M PyneCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research.ORCID 0000-0001-9501-6053
P Adam KellySoutheast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System.
Ellen P FischerCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research.ORCID 0000-0003-3993-0283
Christopher J MillerCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research.ORCID 0000-0002-8695-6833
Patricia WrightCollege of Nursing Research.ORCID 0000-0003-1651-6899
Kara ZamoraSan Francisco VA Health Care System.
Christopher J KoenigSan Francisco VA Health Care System.ORCID 0000-0003-0884-4120
Regina StanleyCenter for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research.ORCID 0000-0003-2593-9711
Karen SealSan Francisco VA Health Care System.
James F BurgessCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research.ORCID 0000-0002-6646-7071
John C FortneyCenter of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care.

Funding

Development and Validation of a Perceived Access MeasureI01HX001114 · VA · CENTRAL ARKANSAS VETERANS HLTHCARE SYS · PI PYNE, JEFFREY M. · 2014 to 2020
–
HSRD VA I01 HX001114South Central Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical CenterVA Health Services Research and Development
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

According to recent Congressional testimony by the Secretary for Veterans Affairs (VA), improving the timeliness of services is one of five current priorities for VA. A comprehensive access measure, grounded in veterans' experience, is essential to support VA's efforts to improve access. In this article, the authors describe the process they used to develop the Perceived Access Inventory (PAI), a veteran-centered measure of perceived access to mental health services. They used a multiphase, mixed-methods approach to develop the PAI. Each phase built on and was informed by preceding phases. In Phase 1, the authors conducted 80 individual, semistructured, qualitative interviews with veterans from 3 geographic regions to elicit the barriers and facilitators they experienced in seeking mental health care. In Phase 2, they generated a preliminary set of 77 PAI items based on Phase 1 qualitative data. In Phase 3, an external expert panel rated the preliminary PAI items in terms of relevance and importance, and provided feedback on format and response options. Thirty-nine PAI items resulted from Phase 3. In Phase 4, veterans gave feedback on the readability and understandability of the PAI items generated in Phase 3. Following completion of these 4 developmental phases, the PAI included 43 items addressing 5 domains: logistics (five items), culture (three items), digital (nine items), systems of care (13 items), and experiences of care (13 items). Future work will evaluate concurrent and predictive validity, test/retest reliability, sensitivity to change, and the need for further item reduction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMental Health ServicesVeteransAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsQualitative ResearchUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID30024190
PMCPMC7449572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.