Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023977›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2018

Survival outcomes after D1 and D2 lymphadenectomy with R0 resection in stage II-III gastric cancer: Longitudinal follow-up in a single center.

Adam Uslu, Baha Zengel, Enver İlhan, Ahmet Aykas, Cenk Şimşek, Orhan Üreyen, Ali Duran, Gökalp Okut

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam UsluDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2697-472X
Baha ZengelDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1812-6846
Enver İlhanDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3212-9709
Ahmet AykasDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0908-7766
Cenk ŞimşekDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9296-0097
Orhan ÜreyenDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7820-9088
Ali DuranDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-2567-5317
Gökalp OkutDepartment of General Surgery, University of Health Sciences, Izmir Bozyaka Research and Training Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3641-5625
Izmir University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveD2 lymphadenectomy (D2-LND) with curative resection (R0) is the cornerstone of gastric cancer treatment. In this study, we compared survival outcomes of D2-LDN with D1-LDN in patients who had undergone curative resection for Stages II and III primary gastric adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND

methodsBetween April 1996 and March 2014, 153 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the stomach underwent total gastrectomy with D1-LND or D2-LND. Among those, 118 patients (38 D1 vs. 80 D2) with a complete history and having been followed for at least 1 year after surgery were enrolled. Both groups were compared in terms of demographic and clinico-pathologic characteristics.

resultsThe mean follow-up was 42.6±52.5 months (mo.). The demographic characteristics of the groups were similar. The Tumor, Node and Metastases (TNM) stage distribution was 25% for Stage II and 75% for Stage III for both groups. Eighteen patients (47.4%) in the D1 and 47 patients (58.8%) in the D2 group were free from locoregional recurrence. The median disease-free survival was 22.0±4.1 mo. for the D1 and 28.0±4.3 mo. for the D2 group (p=0.36). Eight patients (21%) in the D1 and 39 patients (49%) in the D2 group were alive at the last follow-up. The median overall survival (OS) was 22.0±3.7 mo. for the D1 and 31.0±5.4 mo. for the D2 group (p=0.13). The 5-year disease-free survival and OS by the Kaplan-Meier estimates were 41% vs. 51% and 30% vs. 42% in the D1 and D2 groups, respectively. The median 5-year OS for patients with Stages IIIB and IIIC tumors was 14.0±2.2 mo. for the D1 and 20.0±5.0 mo. for the D2 group, respectively (p: 0.048).

conclusionWhen compared to D1-LND, D2-LND with R0 resection have yielded a trend toward a better outcome in patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma.

Indexed as

D1 lymph node dissectionD2 lymph node dissectionR0 resectiontotal gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID30023977
PMCPMC6048646
OpenAlexW2791350675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.