ArticleACS omega2018
Novel Conducting and Biodegradable Copolymers with Noncytotoxic Properties toward Embryonic Stem Cells.
Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biodegradable Conducting Polymer-Based Composites for Biomedical Applications-A Review.Polymers · 2024Review
- Article
- Structure, Biodegradation, and In Vitro Bioactivity of Zn-1%Mg Alloy Strengthened by High-Pressure Torsion.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Polymers Based on PLA from Synthesis Using D,L-Lactic Acid (or Racemic Lactide) and Some Biomedical Applications: A Short Review.Polymers · 2022Review
- Effects of Magnetite Nanoparticles and Static Magnetic Field on Neural Differentiation of Pluripotent Stem Cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Article
- Development and Utilization of Multifunctional Polymeric Scaffolds for the Regulation of Physical Cellular Microenvironments.Polymers · 2021Review
- Electrical Stimulation and Conductive Polymers as a Powerful Toolbox for Tailoring Cell BehaviourFrontiers in medical technology · 2021Review
- Conducting Polymer Grafting: Recent and Key Developments.Polymers · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electroactive biomaterials that are easily processed as scaffolds with good biocompatibility for tissue regeneration are difficult to design. Herein, the synthesis and characterization of a variety of novel electroactive, biodegradable biomaterials based on poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiphene) copolymerized with poly(d,l lactic acid) (PEDOT-
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.