Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023793›Full record

ArticleACS omega2018

Predicting Ligand-Free Cell Attachment on Next-Generation Cellulose-Chitosan Hydrogels.

Marcus A Johns, Yongho Bae, Francisco E G Guimarães, Evandro M Lanzoni, Carlos A R Costa, Paul M Murray, Christoph Deneke, Fernando Galembeck, Janet L Scott, Ram I Sharma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcus A JohnsDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.
Yongho BaeDepartment of Pathology and Anatomical Sciences, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14203, United States.
Francisco E G GuimarãesPhysics Institute of São Carlos, University of São Paulo, São Carlos, SP 13566-590, Brazil.
Evandro M LanzoniBrazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory (LNNano), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil.
Carlos A R CostaBrazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory (LNNano), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil.
Paul M MurrayPaul Murray Catalysis Consulting Ltd., 67 Hudson Close, Yate BS37 4NP, U.K.
Christoph DenekeBrazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory (LNNano), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil.
Fernando GalembeckBrazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory (LNNano), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, SP 13083-970, Brazil.
Janet L ScottDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.
Ram I SharmaDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Centre for Sustainable Chemical Technologies, and Department of Chemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, U.K.
University of Bath · GBBrazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials · BRUnisys (United States) · USUniversidade de Sorocaba · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BRUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing appreciation that engineered biointerfaces can regulate cell behaviors, or functions. Most systems aim to mimic the cell-friendly extracellular matrix environment and incorporate protein ligands; however, the understanding of how a ligand-free system can achieve this is limited. Cell scaffold materials comprised of interfused chitosan-cellulose hydrogels promote cell attachment in ligand-free systems, and we demonstrate the role of cellulose molecular weight, MW, and chitosan content and MW in controlling material properties and thus regulating cell attachment. Semi-interpenetrating network (SIPN) gels, generated from cellulose/ionic liquid/cosolvent solutions, using chitosan solutions as phase inversion solvents, were stable and obviated the need for chemical coupling. Interface properties, including surface zeta-potential, dielectric constant, surface roughness, and shear modulus, were modified by varying the chitosan degree of polymerization and solution concentration, as well as the source of cellulose, creating a family of cellulose-chitosan SIPN materials. These features, in turn, affect cell attachment onto the hydrogels and the utility of this ligand-free approach is extended by forecasting cell attachment using regression modeling to isolate the effects of individual parameters in an initially complex system. We demonstrate that increasing the charge density, and/or shear modulus, of the hydrogel results in increased cell attachment.

Identifiers

PMID30023793
PMCPMC6045362
OpenAlexW2784464793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.