Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023769›Full record

ArticleACS omega2018

X-ray-Structure-Based Identification of Compounds with Activity against Targets from Different Families and Generation of Templates for Multitarget Ligand Design.

Erik Gilberg, Dagmar Stumpfe, Jürgen Bajorath

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Advances in Computational Polypharmacology.Molecular informatics · 2022
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Multiple Target Drug Design Using LigBuilder 3.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Erik GilbergDepartment of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Dahlmannstr. 2, D-53113 Bonn, Germany.
Dagmar StumpfeDepartment of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Dahlmannstr. 2, D-53113 Bonn, Germany.
Jürgen BajorathDepartment of Life Science Informatics, B-IT, LIMES Program Unit Chemical Biology and Medicinal Chemistry, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Dahlmannstr. 2, D-53113 Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compounds with multitarget activity (promiscuity) are increasingly sought in drug discovery. However, promiscuous compounds are often viewed controversially in light of potential assay artifacts that may give rise to false-positive activity annotations. We have reasoned that the strongest evidence for true multitarget activity of small molecules would be provided by experimentally determined structures of ligand-target complexes. Therefore, we have carried out a systematic search of currently available X-ray structures for compounds forming complexes with different targets. Rather unexpectedly, 1418 such crystallographic ligands were identified, including 702 that formed complexes with targets from different protein families (multifamily ligands). About half of these multifamily ligands originated from the medicinal chemistry literature, making it possible to consider additional target annotations and search for analogues. From 168 distinct series of analogues containing one or more multifamily ligands, 133 unique analogue-series-based scaffolds were isolated that can serve as templates for the design of new compounds with multitarget activity. As a part of our study, all of the multifamily ligands we have identified and the analogue-series-based scaffolds are made freely available.

Identifiers

PMID30023769
PMCPMC6045467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.