Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023578›Full record

ArticleACS omega2017

Favorable Biological Responses of Neural Cells and Tissue Interacting with Graphene Oxide Microfibers.

Ankor González-Mayorga, Elisa López-Dolado, María C Gutiérrez, Jorge E Collazos-Castro, M Luisa Ferrer, Francisco Del Monte, María C Serrano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Graphene-Based Materials for Efficient Neurogenesis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Graphene Oxide: Opportunities and Challenges in Biomedicine.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Redox Polymers for Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in medical technology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Translational Regenerative Therapies for Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ankor González-MayorgaHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (HNP-SESCAM), Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
Elisa López-DoladoHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (HNP-SESCAM), Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
María C GutiérrezMaterials Science Factory, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ICMM-CSIC), Calle Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Jorge E Collazos-CastroHospital Nacional de Parapléjicos, Servicio de Salud de Castilla-La Mancha (HNP-SESCAM), Finca La Peraleda s/n, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
M Luisa FerrerMaterials Science Factory, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ICMM-CSIC), Calle Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Del MonteMaterials Science Factory, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ICMM-CSIC), Calle Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
María C SerranoResearch Unit of "Design and Development of Biomaterials for Neural Regeneration", Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos (HNP-SESCAM), Joint Research Unit with CSIC, 45071 Toledo, Spain.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESServicio de Salud de Castilla La Mancha · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural tissue engineering approaches show increasing promise for the treatment of neural diseases including spinal cord injury, for which an efficient therapy is still missing. Encouraged by both positive findings on the interaction of carbon nanomaterials such as graphene with neural components and the necessity of more efficient guidance structures for neural repair, we herein study the potential of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) microfibers as substrates for neural growth in the injured central neural tissue. Compact, bendable, and conductive fibers are obtained. When coated with neural adhesive molecules (poly-l-lysine and N-cadherin), these microfibers behave as supportive substrates of highly interconnected cultures composed of neurons and glial cells for up to 21 days. Synaptic contacts close to rGO are identified. Interestingly, the colonization by meningeal fibroblasts is dramatically hindered by N-cadherin coating. Finally, in vivo studies reveal the feasible implantation of these rGO microfibers as a guidance platform in the injured rat spinal cord, without evident signs of subacute local toxicity. These positive findings boost further investigation at longer implantation times to prove the utility of these substrates as components of advanced therapies for enhancing repair in the damaged central neural tissue including the injured spinal cord.

Identifiers

PMID30023578
PMCPMC6044865
OpenAlexW2769094959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.