Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023547›Full record

ArticleACS omega2017

Polydiacetylene Nanofiber Composites as a Colorimetric Sensor Responding To

Janet P Yapor, Abeer Alharby, Claudia Gentry-Weeks, Melissa M Reynolds, A K M Mashud Alam, Yan Vivian Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Aptamer-functionalized polydiacetylene biosensor for the detection of three foodborne pathogens.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Janet P YaporDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Design and Merchandising, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, and School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Abeer AlharbyDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Design and Merchandising, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, and School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Claudia Gentry-WeeksDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Design and Merchandising, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, and School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Melissa M ReynoldsDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Design and Merchandising, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, and School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
A K M Mashud AlamDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Design and Merchandising, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, and School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Yan Vivian LiDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Design and Merchandising, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, and School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polydiacetylenes (PDAs) are conjugative polymers that demonstrate color changes as a response to an external stimulus. In this study, 10,12-pentacosadiynoic acid (PCDA) was mixed with a supporting polymer including poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) and polyurethane (PU), and the mixture solution was electrospun to construct fiber composites. The electrospun fibers were then photopolymerized using UV irradiation to produce PEO-PDA and PU-PDA nanofiber mats with a fiber diameter ranging from 130 nm to 2.5 μm. The morphologies of both PEO-PDA and PU-PDA nanofibers were dependent on electrospinning parameters such as the ratio of PCDA to PEO or PCDA to PU and the total polymer concentrations. Scanning electron microscopy images showed beaded fibers of PEO-PDA and PU-PDA at 2 and 18 w/v % concentrations, respectively. Smooth fibers were found when the solvent concentration was increased to 3.75 w/v % in PEO-PDA and 25 w/v % in PU-PDA fibers. Both PEO-PDA and PU-PDA nanofiber composites demonstrated excellent colorimetric responses to the presence of

Identifiers

PMID30023547
PMCPMC6045378
OpenAlexW2765441951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.