Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023458›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2018

Exercise therapy in medical rehabilitation: Study protocol of a national survey at facility and practitioner level with a mixed method design.

Wolfgang Geidl, Judith Deprins, René Streber, Nina Rohrbach, Gorden Sudeck, Klaus Pfeifer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wolfgang GeidlDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Division Exercise and Health, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany.
Judith DeprinsInstitute of Sport Science, Department Education and Health Research, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
René StreberDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Division Exercise and Health, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany.
Nina RohrbachDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Division Exercise and Health, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany.
Gorden SudeckInstitute of Sport Science, Department Education and Health Research, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Germany.
Klaus PfeiferDepartment of Sport Science and Sport, Division Exercise and Health, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of physical activity and the orientation of exercise therapy in rehabilitation has changed for many chronic health conditions. Exercise therapy is the most applied therapy form within multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs for almost all chronic health conditions. Despite the scientifically discussed need to refine exercise therapy, there is relatively little knowledge of how exercise therapy is actually conducted. This study protocol describes the methodological procedure used in the project "Exercise therapy in medical rehabilitation: a survey at facility and practitioner level", which aims to take a national survey of exercise therapy in rehabilitation practice in Germany.

methodsThe project was implemented using an explanatory sequential mixed method design. Quantitative and qualitative methods were integrated in two consecutive project phases. Phase 1 used a standardized, quantitative written survey of the heads of exercise therapy departments to compile a national overview of concepts and process features of exercise therapy of individual rehabilitation facilities. Phase 2 recorded individual perspectives and opinions concerning exercise therapy goals, content and methods and current developments in the rehabilitation context (e.g., physical activity promotion, interdisciplinarity, standardization) of exercise therapy practitioners. Over the course of two one-and-a-half day workshops, central themes were introduced and prepared with standardized written individual surveys from Phase 1 and combined with qualitative surveys using facilitated group discussions (focus groups in mixed methods design). DISCUSSION: The project generates a comprehensive picture of exercise therapy in medical rehabilitation at facility level and inserts further information at the practitioner level into this context. The chosen methodology of a mixed method design combines the perspective of the facility with that of the practitioner, thus allowing for a complex and multifaceted description of the status quo in exercise therapy practice and makes it possible to identify facilitators and barriers for the refinement of exercise therapy in specific everyday rehabilitation. These findings form the basis for the systematic development of quality exercise therapy in rehabilitation, in particular in terms of the refinement, implementation and dissemination of biopsychosocial concepts of exercise therapy.

Indexed as

Chronic diseaseDGRW, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rehabilitationswissenschaft (German association for rehabilitation science)DRV, Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (Germany Statutory Pension Insurance Scheme)Health servicesICF, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthKTL, Klassifikation therapeutischer Leistungen (classification of therapeutic services system)Physical activityTherapy conceptTherapy process

Identifiers

PMID30023458
PMCPMC6022355
OpenAlexW2799750655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.