Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30023366›Full record

ArticleAnnals of translational medicine2018

Compensatory hyperhidrosis after different surgeries at the same sympathetic levels: a meta-analysis.

Xiaojun Du, Xu Zhu, Tao Wang, Xiao Hu, Peng Lin, Yin Teng, Chao Fan, Jianglun Li, Yang Xi, Jiarong Xiao and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of translational medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Selective TScientific reports · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaojun DuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Xu ZhuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Tao WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Xiao HuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Peng LinDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Yin TengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Chao FanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Jianglun LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Yang XiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Jiarong XiaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Wen LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Jian ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China.
Haiyu ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Dan TianDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, China.
Shizhang YuanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Guiyang Public Health Clinical Center, Guiyang 550003, China.
Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University · CNGuiyang Medical University · CNGuangdong General Hospital · CNShanghai Public Health Clinical Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferent techniques of video-assisted thoracoscopic sympathetic surgery have become the radical treatments for palmar and axillary hyperhidrosis (AH). However, there is no consensus over which technique can make a minimal incidence of compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH). This study was designed to compare the incidence of CH after different techniques at the same sympathetic levels in the treatment of upper limb and facial hyperhidrosis (FH).

methodsThe databases of PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Ovid Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify studies comparing different surgical techniques at the same sympathetic levels for upper limb and FH. The data was analyzed by Revman 5.3 software.

resultsA total of ten studies involving 896 patients were included, of whom 149 underwent sympathectomy, 435 underwent sympathicotomy, and 312 under endoscopic sympathetic clip (ESC). Meta-analysis showed that the difference of incidence of CH and patients' satisfaction was not significant between sympathectomy and sympathicotomy (P=0.05, 0.19, respectively). But, the incidence of CH is significant lower after ESC than after sympathicotomy (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.04-2.38, P=0.03). However, the incidence of moderate/severe CH between these two groups is not significant different (OR: 1.49, 95% CI: 0.93-2.39, P=0.10).

conclusionsIf only CH and the same sympathetic levels concerned, sympathectomy and sympathicotomy is equal for upper limb hyperhidrosis and FH. And, ESC should be recommended for a lower incidence of CH, comparing with sympathicotomy.

Indexed as

Compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH)endoscopic sympathetic clip (ESC)sympathectomysympathicotomy

Identifiers

PMID30023366
PMCPMC6035986
OpenAlexW2805225595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.