ReviewJournal of microscopy and ultrastructure
Regenerative medicine: Clinical applications and future perspectives.
Review in Journal of microscopy and ultrastructure. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Interface of Gene Editing with Regenerative Medicine.Engineering (Beijing, China) · 2025Article
- Nano-Delivery Revolution: Harnessing Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Exosomes' Potential for Wound Healing.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Fabrication of nanofibrous mat surrounded hydrogel scaffold as an encapsulation device for encapsulating pancreas β cells.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Regenerative Medicine and Angiogenesis; Focused on Cardiovascular Disease.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2022Review
- Highlights on Advancing Frontiers in Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2022Review
- Tissue engineering of the gastrointestinal tract: the historic path to translation.Journal of biological engineering · 2022Review
- An alginate-based encapsulation system for delivery of therapeutic cells to the CNS.RSC advances · 2022Article
- A Bibliometric Review of Artificial Extracellular Matrices Based on Tissue Engineering Technology Literature: 1990 through 2019.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Progression of Regenerative Medicine and its Impact on Therapy Translation.Clinical and translational science · 2020Review
- PLGA nanoparticles as a platform for vitamin D-based cancer therapy.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After many years of basic research, regenerative medicine (RM) is now beginning to represent a valuable tool to cure several clinical conditions in both acute injuries and chronic diseases. The aim of this study is to update readers on current clinical applications of some selected organs and pathologies which may benefit from RM. An extensive literature research was performed using PubMed, Google and specialized journals. RM has achieved great successes, but there are still several challenges to tackle before it could be used on a daily basis in clinical practice. The crucial point of this revolution is represented by the appropriate and valid translation from bench to bedside.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.